• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Administration costs of intravenous biologic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎静脉用生物药物的给药成本。
Springerplus. 2013 Oct 17;2:531. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-531. eCollection 2013.
2
Analysis of drug and administrative costs allowed by U.S. Private and public third-party payers for 3 intravenous biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis.美国私人和公共第三方支付者对3种类风湿关节炎静脉注射生物制剂的药物及管理成本分析。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 May;17(4):313-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.4.313.
3
Costs of Providing Infusion Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Hospital-based Infusion Center Setting.在医院输液中心环境下为类风湿关节炎提供输液治疗的成本。
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1600-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
A cost-cost study comparing etanercept with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis.一项比较依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的成本-成本研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(10):1051-64. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119100-00006.
5
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, tocilizumab and TNF-inhibitors compared with rituximab as second-line biologic drug in rheumatoid arthritis.阿巴西普、托珠单抗和 TNF 抑制剂与利妥昔单抗作为类风湿关节炎二线生物药物的成本效益比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220142. eCollection 2019.
6
Cost-effectiveness of early treatment of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients with abatacept.早期使用阿巴西普治疗抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性类风湿关节炎患者的成本效益分析。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 May-Jun;36(3):448-454. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Patient and physician perception of the infusion process of the biologic agents abatacept, infliximab, and rituximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.患者和医生对生物制剂阿巴西普、英夫利昔单抗和利妥昔单抗输注过程的看法,用于治疗类风湿关节炎。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 Nov-Dec;27(6):907-13.
8
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
9
Costs of administration, travelling, and productivity losses associated with hospital administration of multiple myeloma drugs in Finland.芬兰医院管理多发性骨髓瘤药物所产生的管理成本、差旅成本及生产力损失。
J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):328-335. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1569457. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
Cost-effectiveness simulation model of biologic strategies for treating to target rheumatoid arthritis in Germany.治疗德国靶向类风湿关节炎的生物策略的成本效益模拟模型。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 May-Jun;31(3):400-8. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Budget impact analysis of the subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13 SC) for treating inflammatory bowel disease in the Big-5 European (E5) countries.在 E5 欧洲五国(E5)中,采用皮下注射英夫利昔单抗(CT-P13 SC)治疗炎症性肠病的预算影响分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):1319. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08683-y.
2
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Subcutaneous Infliximab for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Sequential Biologic Treatment.生物序贯治疗中皮下注射英夫利昔单抗治疗炎症性肠病的成本效果分析。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jun 1;29(6):898-913. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac160.
3
Cost Assessment Modelling of Treatments for Highly Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.高活性复发型多发性硬化症治疗的成本评估模型。
Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):800-818. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01186-z. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, tocilizumab and TNF-inhibitors compared with rituximab as second-line biologic drug in rheumatoid arthritis.阿巴西普、托珠单抗和 TNF 抑制剂与利妥昔单抗作为类风湿关节炎二线生物药物的成本效益比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220142. eCollection 2019.
5
Cost-effectiveness of secukinumab compared to other biologics in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in Finland.在芬兰,司库奇尤单抗与其他生物制剂相比治疗强直性脊柱炎的成本效益。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Feb 15;11:159-168. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S192235. eCollection 2019.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of secukinumab versus other biologics and apremilast in the treatment of active Psoriatic arthritis: a Finnish perspective.司库奇尤单抗与其他生物制剂及阿普米司特治疗活动性银屑病关节炎的成本效益分析:芬兰视角
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Nov 16;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0162-3. eCollection 2018.
7
Managing Rheumatoid Arthritis with Dietary Interventions.通过饮食干预管理类风湿性关节炎。
Front Nutr. 2017 Nov 8;4:52. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2017.00052. eCollection 2017.
8
Modeled Health Economic Impact of a Hypothetical Certolizumab Pegol Risk-Sharing Scheme for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Finland.芬兰中度至重度类风湿性关节炎患者使用聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗假设性风险共担方案的模拟健康经济影响
Adv Ther. 2017 Oct;34(10):2316-2332. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0614-8. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
9
An estimate of the cost of administering intravenous biological agents in Spanish day hospitals.西班牙日间医院静脉注射生物制剂的给药成本估算。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Mar 14;13:325-334. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S112062. eCollection 2017.
10
Primary-care-based episodes of care and their costs in a three-month follow-up in Finland.芬兰三个月随访中基于初级保健的护理事件及其成本。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(4):283-90. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1114352.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic benefits of optimizing anchor therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.优化类风湿关节炎锚定治疗的经济效益。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jun;51 Suppl 4:iv21-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes088.
2
Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept, and tocilizumab as first-line treatments for moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.阿达木单抗、依那西普和托珠单抗作为中重度类风湿关节炎一线治疗药物的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(2):340-51. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.649327. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
3
Non-adherence to drug therapy and drug acquisition costs in a national population--a patient-based register study.全国范围内的药物治疗不依从和药物获取成本——一项基于患者的登记研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 28;11:326. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-326.
4
Modelling cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments based on disease activity scores for the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Spain.基于疾病活动评分对西班牙类风湿性关节炎治疗中生物制剂治疗的成本效益进行建模。
Int J Inflam. 2011;2011:727634. doi: 10.4061/2011/727634. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
5
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗和阿巴西普治疗肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Mar;15(14):1-278. doi: 10.3310/hta15140.
6
Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.依那西普、英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗治疗银屑病关节炎:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(10):i-xxi, 1-329. doi: 10.3310/hta15100.
7
A systematic review and economic evaluation of the use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, for Crohn's disease.TNF-α 抑制剂(阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗)治疗克罗恩病的系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(6):1-244. doi: 10.3310/hta15060.
8
Cost-effectiveness of infliximab for the treatment of active and progressive psoriatic arthritis.英夫利昔单抗治疗活动期和进展性银屑病关节炎的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.016.
9
Treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with or without rituximab: cost-effectiveness and value of information based on a 5-year follow-up.利妥昔单抗联合或不联合治疗滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:基于 5 年随访的成本效益和信息价值。
Ann Oncol. 2011 May;22(5):1189-1197. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq582. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
10
A retrospective cohort study of the impact of biologic therapy initiation on medical resource use and costs in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.一项回顾性队列研究,旨在评估生物治疗对中重度银屑病患者医疗资源利用和成本的影响。
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Oct;163(4):807-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09944.x.

类风湿关节炎静脉用生物药物的给药成本。

Administration costs of intravenous biologic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Soini Erkki J, Leussu Miina, Hallinen Taru

机构信息

ESiOR Ltd, Tulliportinkatu 2 LT4, 70100 Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Springerplus. 2013 Oct 17;2:531. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-531. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1186/2193-1801-2-531
PMID:24255834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3825225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cost-effectiveness studies explicitly reporting infusion times, drug-specific administration costs for infusions or real-payer intravenous drug cost are few in number. Yet, administration costs for infusions are needed in the health economic evaluations assessing intravenously-administered drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the drug-specific administration and total cost of biologic intravenous rheumatoid arthritis (RA) drugs in the adult population and to compare the obtained costs with published cost estimates.

METHODS

Cost price data for the infusions and drugs were systematically collected from the 2011 Finnish price lists. All Finnish hospitals with available price lists were included. Drug administration and total costs (administration cost + drug price) per infusion were analysed separately from the public health care payer's perspective. Further adjustments for drug brand, dose, and hospital type were done using regression methods in order to improve the comparability between drugs. Annual expected drug administration and total costs were estimated. A literature search not limited to RA was performed to obtain the per infusion administration cost estimates used in publications. The published costs were converted to Finnish values using base-year purchasing power parities and indexing to the year 2011.

RESULTS

Information from 19 (95%) health districts was obtained (107 analysable prices out of 176 observations). The average drug administration cost for infliximab, rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab infusion in RA were €355.91; €561.21; €334.00; and €293.96, respectively. The regression-adjusted (dose, hospital type; using semi-log ordinary least squares) mean administration costs for infliximab and rituximab infusions in RA were €289.12 (95% CI €222.61-375.48) and €542.28 (95% CI €307.23-957.09). The respective expected annual drug administration costs were €2312.96 for infliximab during the first year, €1879.28 for infliximab during the forthcoming years, and €1843.75 for rituximab. The obtained average administration costs per infusion were higher (1.8-3.3 times depending on the drug) than the previously published purchasing power adjusted and indexed average administration costs for infusions in RA.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration costs of RA infusions vary between drugs, and more effort should be made to find realistic drug-specific estimates for cost-effectiveness evaluations. The frequent assumption of intravenous drug administration costs equalling outpatient visit cost can underestimate the costs.

摘要

背景

明确报告输注时间、特定药物输注给药成本或实际支付方的静脉用药成本的成本效益研究数量较少。然而,在评估静脉给药药物的卫生经济评价中,需要输注给药成本。

目的

估计成人群体中生物制剂静脉注射类风湿关节炎(RA)药物的特定药物给药及总成本,并将所得成本与已发表的成本估计值进行比较。

方法

从2011年芬兰价格表中系统收集输注和药物的成本价格数据。纳入所有有可用价格表的芬兰医院。从公共医疗保健支付方的角度分别分析每次输注的药物给药及总成本(给药成本+药物价格)。为提高药物之间的可比性,使用回归方法对药物品牌、剂量和医院类型进行进一步调整。估计年度预期药物给药及总成本。进行不限于RA的文献检索,以获取出版物中使用的每次输注给药成本估计值。使用基年购买力平价并索引至2011年,将已发表的成本换算为芬兰货币价值。

结果

获得了19个(95%)卫生区的信息(176个观察值中有107个可分析价格)。RA中英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗、阿巴西普和托珠单抗输注的平均药物给药成本分别为355.91欧元、561.21欧元、334.00欧元和293.96欧元。RA中英夫利昔单抗和利妥昔单抗输注的回归调整后(剂量、医院类型;使用半对数普通最小二乘法)平均给药成本分别为289.12欧元(95%CI 222.61 - 375.48欧元)和542.28欧元(95%CI 307.23 - 957.09欧元)。英夫利昔单抗第一年的预期年度药物给药成本为2312.96欧元,后续年份为1879.28欧元,利妥昔单抗为1843.75欧元。获得的每次输注平均给药成本高于先前发表的经购买力调整和索引的RA输注平均给药成本(根据药物不同为1.8 - 3.3倍)。

结论

RA输注的给药成本因药物而异,应做出更多努力以找到用于成本效益评估的实际特定药物估计值。静脉用药给药成本等于门诊就诊成本这一常见假设可能会低估成本。