Centre for Social Science and Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Malar J. 2013 Nov 20;12:427. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-427.
In endemic regions of sub-Saharan Africa, malaria during pregnancy (MiP) is a major preventable cause of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Current recommended MiP prevention and control includes intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp), distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and appropriate case management. This article explores the social and cultural context to the uptake of these interventions at four sites across Africa.
A comparative qualitative study was conducted at four sites in three countries: Ghana, Malawi and Kenya. Individual and group interviews were conducted with pregnant women, their relatives, opinion leaders, other community members and health providers. Observations, which focused on behaviours linked to MiP prevention and treatment, were also undertaken at health facilities and in local communities.
ITNs were generally recognized as important for malaria prevention. However, their availability and use differed across the sites. In Malawi and Kenya, ITNs were sought-after items, but there were complaints about availability. In central Ghana, women saved ITNs until the birth of the child and they were used seasonally in northern Ghana. In Kenya and central Ghana, pregnant women did not associate IPTp with malaria, whereas, in Malawi and northern Ghana, IPTp was linked to malaria, but not always with prevention. Although IPTp adherence was common at all sites, whether delivered with directly observed treatment or not, a few women did not comply with IPTp often citing previous side effects. Although generally viewed as positive, experiences of malaria testing varied across the four sites: treatment was sometimes administered in spite of a negative diagnosis in Ghana (observed) and Malawi (reported). Despite generally following the advice of healthcare staff, particularly in Kenya, personal experience, and the availability and accessibility of medication--including anti-malarials--influenced MiP treatment.
Although ITNs were valued as malaria prevention, health messages could address issues that reduce their use during pregnancy in particular contexts. The impact of previous side effects on adherence to IPTp and anti-malarial treatment regimens during pregnancy also requires attention. Overtreatment of MiP highlights the need to monitor the implementation of MiP case management guidelines.
在撒哈拉以南非洲的流行地区,妊娠期间疟疾(MiP)是导致孕产妇和婴儿发病率和死亡率的一个主要可预防原因。目前推荐的 MiP 预防和控制措施包括间歇性预防治疗(IPT)、发放驱虫蚊帐(ITN)和适当的病例管理。本文探讨了在非洲四个地点采用这些干预措施的社会和文化背景。
在三个国家的四个地点进行了一项比较定性研究:加纳、马拉维和肯尼亚。对孕妇、其亲属、意见领袖、其他社区成员和卫生保健提供者进行了个人和小组访谈。还在卫生保健机构和当地社区进行了侧重于与 MiP 预防和治疗相关行为的观察。
ITN 通常被认为是预防疟疾的重要手段。然而,它们在不同地点的可获得性和使用情况有所不同。在马拉维和肯尼亚,ITN 是备受追捧的物品,但存在供应不足的抱怨。在加纳中部,妇女将 ITN 保存到孩子出生时使用,在加纳北部则季节性使用。在肯尼亚和加纳中部,孕妇不将 IPT 与疟疾联系起来,而在马拉维和加纳北部,IPT 与疟疾有关,但并不总是与预防有关。尽管所有地点都普遍遵守 IPTp 规定,无论是否进行直接观察治疗,但少数妇女不遵守 IPTp 规定,经常提到以前的副作用。尽管疟疾检测的经验在四个地点都普遍被认为是积极的,但情况有所不同:在加纳(观察到)和马拉维(报告),有时尽管诊断为阴性,仍会进行治疗。尽管普遍遵循卫生保健工作人员的建议,特别是在肯尼亚,但个人经验以及药物(包括抗疟药)的可获得性和可及性会影响 MiP 治疗。
尽管 ITN 被视为疟疾预防的手段,但在特定情况下,健康信息可以解决降低其在妊娠期间使用的问题。以前的副作用对孕妇接受 IPTp 和抗疟治疗方案的依从性的影响也需要引起关注。过度治疗 MiP 突出表明需要监测 MiP 病例管理指南的执行情况。