Suppr超能文献

小儿阑尾炎的结局:美国和加拿大的国际比较。

Outcomes of pediatric appendicitis: an international comparison of the United States and Canada.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2014 Jan;149(1):50-5. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2517.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Pediatric appendicitis outcomes have been shown to be influenced by several patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-level factors. However, to our knowledge, no prior studies have investigated the effect of health care systems on outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the outcomes of children with appendicitis are better in the Canadian single-payer universal health care system than in the US multipayer system.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based comparison of outcomes using the US Kids' Inpatient Database and the Canadian Discharge Abstract Database was performed. Subanalyses by age group, US insurance status, and severity of appendicitis (nonperforated or perforated) were also performed. We included patients younger than 18 years coded for nonincidental, urgent appendectomy in the 2006 and 2009 Kids' Inpatient Database (78,625) and 2004 to 2010 Discharge Abstract Database (41,492).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Perforation rate, normal appendix rate, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Canadian patients had higher rates of normal appendix (6.3% vs 4.3%; P < .001) and perforated appendicitis (27.3% vs 26.7%; P = .04). The Canadian perforation rate fell in the middle between privately insured (24.1%) and publicly insured or noninsured US patients (30.4% and 31.2%, respectively). The Canadian perforation rate was lower in the 0- to 5-year age group (47.7% vs 52.3%; P < .001) and higher in the 12- to 17-year age group (24.7% vs 21.8%; P < .001) vs US patients. In Canada, hospital stay was longer after simple appendicitis (mean [SD], 2.0 [1.2] vs 1.7 [1.2] days; P < .001) and shorter after perforated appendicitis (mean [SD], 4.8 [3.6] vs 5.3 [3.7] days; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Differences in outcomes of pediatric appendicitis between the United States and Canada are influenced by age and US insurance status. These differences are relevant to health policy decisions in both nations.

摘要

重要性

已有研究表明,小儿阑尾炎的结局受到患者、外科医生和医院等多个层面因素的影响。然而,据我们所知,目前尚无研究调查医疗保健系统对结局的影响。

目的

检验假设,即加拿大单一支付方全民医保体系下小儿阑尾炎的结局要好于美国多支付方体系。

设计、地点和参与者:在美国 Kids' Inpatient Database 数据库和加拿大 Discharge Abstract Database 数据库中开展了一项基于人群的结局比较研究。还进行了按年龄组、美国保险状况和阑尾炎严重程度(穿孔与非穿孔)的亚组分析。我们纳入了 2006 年和 2009 年 Kids' Inpatient Database(78625 例)及 2004 年至 2010 年 Discharge Abstract Database(41492 例)中编码为非偶发性、紧急阑尾切除术的年龄小于 18 岁的患者。

主要结局和测量指标

穿孔率、正常阑尾率和住院时间。

结果

加拿大患者的正常阑尾率(6.3% vs 4.3%;P < .001)和穿孔性阑尾炎率(27.3% vs 26.7%;P = .04)更高。加拿大的穿孔率处于私人保险(24.1%)和美国有保险或无保险患者(分别为 30.4%和 31.2%)之间。05 岁年龄组的加拿大穿孔率更低(47.7% vs 52.3%;P < .001),1217 岁年龄组更高(24.7% vs 21.8%;P < .001)。在加拿大,单纯性阑尾炎患者的住院时间更长(平均[标准差],2.0[1.2] vs 1.7[1.2]天;P < .001),而穿孔性阑尾炎患者的住院时间更短(平均[标准差],4.8[3.6] vs 5.3[3.7]天;P < .001)。

结论和意义

美国和加拿大小儿阑尾炎结局的差异受到年龄和美国保险状况的影响。这些差异与两国的卫生政策决策相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验