• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肥胖人群急性非穿孔与穿孔阑尾炎的比较。

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2011 Dec;202(6):733-8; discussion 738-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.034. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.034
PMID:21992808
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been increasing in obese patients. We evaluated the outcomes of LA compared with open appendectomy (OA) in obese patients.

METHODS

By using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, clinical data of obese patients who underwent LA and OA for suspected acute appendicitis (perforated or nonperforated) from 2006 to 2008 were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 42,426 obese patients underwent an appendectomy during this period. In acute nonperforated cases, LA had a lower overall complication rate (7.17% vs 11.72%; P < .01), mortality rate (.09% vs .23%; P < .01), mean hospital charges ($25,193 vs $26,380; P = .04), and shorter mean length of stay (2.0 vs 3.1 d; P < .01) compared with OA. Similarly, in perforated cases, LA was associated with a lower overall complication rate (22.34% vs 34.65%; P < .01), mortality rate (.0% vs .50%; P < .01), mean hospital charges ($36,843 vs $43,901; P < .01), and a shorter mean length of stay (4.4 vs 6.5 d; P < .01) compared with OA.

CONCLUSIONS

LA can be performed safely with superior outcomes compared with OA in obese patients and should be considered the procedure of choice for perforated and nonperforated appendicitis in these patients.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)在肥胖患者中的应用越来越多。我们评估了 LA 与开放阑尾切除术(OA)治疗肥胖患者急性阑尾炎(穿孔或未穿孔)的结果。

方法

利用全国住院患者样本数据库,对 2006 年至 2008 年期间接受 LA 和 OA 治疗疑似急性阑尾炎(穿孔或未穿孔)的肥胖患者的临床数据进行了检查。

结果

共有 42426 名肥胖患者在此期间接受了阑尾切除术。在急性非穿孔病例中,LA 的总并发症发生率(7.17%比 11.72%;P<.01)、死亡率(0.09%比 0.23%;P<.01)、平均住院费用($25193 比$26380;P=.04)和平均住院时间(2.0 比 3.1 d;P<.01)均低于 OA。同样,在穿孔病例中,LA 的总并发症发生率(22.34%比 34.65%;P<.01)、死亡率(0.0%比 0.50%;P<.01)、平均住院费用($36843 比$43901;P<.01)和平均住院时间(4.4 比 6.5 d;P<.01)均低于 OA。

结论

LA 可安全用于肥胖患者,与 OA 相比具有更好的疗效,对于穿孔和未穿孔的阑尾炎,应考虑作为首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肥胖人群急性非穿孔与穿孔阑尾炎的比较。
Am J Surg. 2011 Dec;202(6):733-8; discussion 738-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.034. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
2
Outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者急性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的疗效
Am Surg. 2011 Oct;77(10):1372-6.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004-2011.美国腹腔镜阑尾切除术的趋势与结果:来自2004 - 2011年全国住院患者样本(NIS)的数据
Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):1074-7.
4
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
5
Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese.对于病态肥胖患者的急性阑尾炎,腹腔镜检查应是首选的治疗方法。
Am J Surg. 2008 Aug;196(2):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.067. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
6
Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.老年患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的优势。
Am Surg. 2006 Jun;72(6):474-80.
7
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
9
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
10
Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in obese patients.在肥胖患者中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术优于开腹阑尾切除术。
Am J Surg. 2007 Dec;194(6):877-80; discussion 880-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.043.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome and quality of life in obese patients underwent laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy.肥胖患者行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的结局和生活质量比较。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01732-7.
2
Appendectomy in Patients with Morbid Obesity: Laparoscopic versus Conventional Technique.肥胖症患者的阑尾切除术:腹腔镜与传统技术。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Dec 8;26:e928067. doi: 10.12659/MSM.928067.
3
Laparoscopic versus open approach for diffuse peritonitis from appendicitis ethiology: a subgroup analysis from the Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) study.
腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗阑尾炎引起弥漫性腹膜炎:来自生理参数预测腹部脓毒症(PIPAS)研究的亚组分析。
Updates Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):185-191. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00711-y. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
[Appendectomy: open versus laparoscopic versus single port : Evidence for choice of surgical procedure].[阑尾切除术:开放手术与腹腔镜手术与单孔手术:手术方式选择的证据]
Chirurg. 2019 Mar;90(3):186-193. doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0758-3.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature.系统评价和荟萃分析:腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的成人患者:文献更新。
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3083-3099. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4123-3.
6
The influence of underweight and obesity on the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis in children.体重过轻和肥胖对儿童阑尾炎诊断和治疗的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Aug;31(8):1467-73. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2614-6. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy.腹腔镜与小切口开放性阑尾切除术
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct 27;7(10):267-72. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.267.
8
Trends and outcomes in the utilization of laparoscopic appendectomies in a low-income population in Taiwan from 2003 to 2011.2003年至2011年台湾低收入人群腹腔镜阑尾切除术的使用趋势与结果
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 24;14:100. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0248-x.
9
Is laparoscopic appendectomy going to be standard procedure for acute appendicitis; a 5-year single center experience with 1,788 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术会成为急性阑尾炎的标准术式吗?一项针对1788例患者的单中心5年经验总结。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Feb;41(1):87-9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0411-x. Epub 2014 May 31.
10
Single-site laparoscopic appendectomy in children using conventional instruments: a prospective, randomized, control trial.使用传统器械的儿童单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Feb;31(2):167-71. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3636-1. Epub 2014 Nov 9.