Mosuka Emmanuel Mudika, Thilakarathne Kalanchige N, Mansuri Naushad M, Mann Neelam K, Rizwan Shariqa, Mohamed Afrah E, Elshafey Ahmed E, Khadka Akanchha, Mohammed Lubna
Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, CMR.
Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Oct 19;13(10):e18901. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18901. eCollection 2021 Oct.
More than a century after its introduction, appendectomy has remained the gold standard treatment for acute appendicitis. In adults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, nonoperative management (NOM) has been shown to be a viable treatment option. To date, there has been relatively limited data on the nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. The primary objective of this study was to systematically review the available literature in the pediatric population and compare the efficacy and recurrence between initial nonoperative treatment strategy and appendectomy in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. In July 2021, we conducted systematic searches of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. We only included full-text comparative original studies published within the last decade, and we excluded articles that solely examined NOM without comparing it to appendectomy. Two writers worked independently on the data collection and analysis. It was found that NOM had a high initial success rate and a low rate of recurrent appendicitis. After months of follow-up, the vast majority of patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis who received initial nonoperative treatment did not require surgical intervention. Furthermore, the rate of complication was comparable in both treatment groups, and NOM did not appear to be associated with an increased risk of complications. The most significant drawback stemmed from the fact that the included articles in this study had a wide range of study designs and inclusion criteria. According to current evidence, NOM is feasible and cost-effective. Antibiotic therapy can be given safely in a small subset of individuals with uncomplicated appendicitis. To optimize outcomes, physicians should evaluate the clinical presentation and the patient's desire when selecting those to be managed nonoperatively. Again, more research, preferably large randomized trials, is required to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of NOM with appendicectomy. Finally, additional research is required to establish the characteristics of patients who are the best candidates for nonoperative treatment.
阑尾切除术问世一个多世纪以来,一直是急性阑尾炎的金标准治疗方法。在患有急性单纯性阑尾炎的成年人中,非手术治疗(NOM)已被证明是一种可行的治疗选择。迄今为止,关于小儿急性阑尾炎非手术治疗的数据相对有限。本研究的主要目的是系统回顾小儿人群中的现有文献,并比较单纯性阑尾炎患儿初始非手术治疗策略与阑尾切除术的疗效和复发率。2021年7月,我们对PubMed和谷歌学术数据库进行了系统检索。我们只纳入了过去十年内发表的全文比较性原始研究,排除了仅研究非手术治疗而未与阑尾切除术进行比较的文章。两位作者独立进行数据收集和分析。结果发现,非手术治疗初始成功率高,复发性阑尾炎发生率低。经过数月的随访,绝大多数接受初始非手术治疗的单纯性急性阑尾炎患者无需手术干预。此外,两个治疗组的并发症发生率相当,非手术治疗似乎与并发症风险增加无关。最显著的缺点源于本研究纳入的文章研究设计和纳入标准范围广泛。根据目前的证据,非手术治疗是可行且具有成本效益的。抗生素治疗可安全地应用于一小部分单纯性阑尾炎患者。为了优化治疗效果,医生在选择非手术治疗的患者时应评估临床表现和患者的意愿。同样,需要更多的研究,最好是大型随机试验,来比较非手术治疗与阑尾切除术的长期临床疗效。最后,需要进一步的研究来确定最适合非手术治疗的患者特征。