University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Feb;48(2):187-95. doi: 10.1177/1060028013512110. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
Methadone is commonly prescribed for children with opioid abstinence syndrome (OAS) as a taper schedule over several days to weeks. The Medication Taper Complexity Score (MTCS) was developed to evaluate outpatient methadone tapers.
To further validate the MTCS and determine if it is a reliable tool for clinicians to use to assess the complexity of methadone tapers for OAS.
An expert panel of pediatric clinical pharmacists was convened. Panel members were provided 9 methadone tapers (ie, "easy," "medium," and "difficult") to determine construct and face validity of the MTCS. The primary objective was to further establish reliability and construct/face validity of the MTCS. The secondary objective was to assess the reliability of the MTCS within and between tapers. Instrument reliability was assessed using a Pearson correlation coefficient; with 0.8 as the minimum acceptable coefficient. Construct (divergent) validity was assessed via a repeated-measures ANOVA analysis (Bonferroni post hoc analyses) of the mean scores provided by panel members.
Six panel members were recruited from various geographical locations. Panel members had 18.3 ± 5.5 years of experience, with practice expertise in general pediatrics, hematology/oncology, and the pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit. The MTCS had a reliability coefficient of .9949. There was vivid discrimination between the easy, medium, and difficult tapers; P = .001. The panel recommended minor modifications to the MTCS.
The MTCS was found to be a reliable and valid tool. Overall, the panel felt that the MTCS was easy to use and had potential applications in both practice and research.
美沙酮常用于治疗阿片类药物戒断综合征(OAS)的儿童,通常以数天至数周的时间逐步减少剂量。药物递减复杂性评分(MTCS)用于评估门诊美沙酮递减方案。
进一步验证 MTCS,并确定其是否为临床医生评估 OAS 美沙酮递减方案复杂性的可靠工具。
召集了一组儿科临床药师专家小组。向小组成员提供 9 个美沙酮递减方案(即“简单”、“中等”和“困难”),以确定 MTCS 的结构和表面效度。主要目标是进一步确定 MTCS 的可靠性和结构/表面效度。次要目标是评估 MTCS 在不同方案之间的可靠性。使用 Pearson 相关系数评估仪器可靠性;最低可接受系数为 0.8。通过专家小组成员提供的平均分数的重复测量方差分析(Bonferroni 事后分析)评估结构(发散)有效性。
从不同地理位置招募了 6 名小组成员。小组成员有 18.3±5.5 年的经验,在普通儿科、血液学/肿瘤学以及儿科和新生儿重症监护病房有专业实践经验。MTCS 的可靠性系数为 0.9949。容易、中等和困难的递减方案之间存在明显的区分;P=0.001。专家组建议对 MTCS 进行微小修改。
MTCS 被证明是一种可靠且有效的工具。总体而言,专家组认为 MTCS 使用方便,在实践和研究中有潜在的应用。