• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2005 年至 2010 年间,241327 例新诊断糖尿病成人患者的初始抗高血糖药物治疗:糖尿病监测、预防和管理(SUPREME-DM)研究。

Initial antihyperglycemic drug therapy among 241 327 adults with newly identified diabetes from 2005 through 2010: a surveillance, prevention, and management of diabetes mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Oct;47(10):1280-91. doi: 10.1177/1060028013503624.

DOI:10.1177/1060028013503624
PMID:24259692
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among adults with incident diabetes, data are lacking about first antihyperglycemic initiation and whether medication choice aligns with recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of initiating any antihyperglycemic, and specifically sulfonylurea versus metformin.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 241 327 patients from 11 US health systems, 2005 through 2010. Assessments included antihyperglycemic initiation within 6 months of diabetes identification, first medication initiated, and initiation predictors.

RESULTS

Only 40.3% (n = 97 350) started any antihyperglycemic; 75.2% (n = 73 221) started metformin. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) predicted initiating any antihyperglycemic (HbA1c >9%, relative risk [RR] = 3.94, 95% CI = 3.82, 4.07, vs HbA1c >6.5%-7%). Age modified the HbA1c effect: at higher HbA1c, likelihood of starting antihyperglycemics differed little across ages; at lower HbA1c, older patients were less likely to start antihyperglycemics (P < .001). Individuals with elevated serum creatinine (SCr) were more likely to started on sulfonylurea (SCr = 1.4-2, RR = 2.21 [2.05, 2.39]; SCr >2, RR = 2.75 [2.30, 3.29] vs normal SCr), particularly as HbA1c increased: patients with HbA1c 8%-9% and SCr >2 were 5.59 times (2.94, 10.65) more likely to start sulfonylurea versus those with HbA1c >6.5%-7% and normal SCr. Age predicted sulfonylurea initiation (20-39 years, RR = 0.87 [0.79, 0.95]; ≥ 80 years, RR = 2.41 [2.20, 2.65] vs 50-59 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with incident diabetes, metformin was generally the first antihyperglycemic initiated. However, 59.7% did not start any antihyperglycemic at diabetes identification. HbA1c and age predict antihyperglycemic initiation; SCr and age predict sulfonylurea initiation.

摘要

背景

在新诊断为糖尿病的成年人中,缺乏关于首次使用抗高血糖药物的起始以及药物选择是否符合推荐的相关数据。

目的

确定使用任何抗高血糖药物起始治疗(包括磺酰脲类药物和二甲双胍)的预测因素。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了来自美国 11 个医疗系统的 241327 名患者,时间范围为 2005 年至 2010 年。评估包括糖尿病确诊后 6 个月内抗高血糖药物起始治疗、起始治疗药物以及预测因素。

结果

仅有 40.3%(n=97350)的患者使用了任何一种抗高血糖药物;75.2%(n=73221)的患者起始使用了二甲双胍。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)预测了使用任何抗高血糖药物起始治疗(HbA1c>9%,相对风险[RR]为 3.94,95%CI为 3.82,4.07,vs HbA1c>6.5%-7%)。年龄改变了 HbA1c 的影响:在较高的 HbA1c 水平下,不同年龄段开始使用抗高血糖药物的可能性差异较小;在较低的 HbA1c 水平下,年龄较大的患者不太可能开始使用抗高血糖药物(P<0.001)。血清肌酐(SCr)升高的患者更有可能起始使用磺酰脲类药物(SCr=1.4-2,RR=2.21[2.05,2.39];SCr>2,RR=2.75[2.30,3.29],vs 正常 SCr),尤其是在 HbA1c 升高时:HbA1c 为 8%-9%且 SCr>2 的患者起始使用磺酰脲类药物的可能性是 HbA1c >6.5%-7%且 SCr 正常的患者的 5.59 倍(2.94,10.65)。年龄预测了磺酰脲类药物的起始治疗(20-39 岁,RR=0.87[0.79,0.95];≥80 岁,RR=2.41[2.20,2.65],vs 50-59 岁)。

结论

在新诊断为糖尿病的成年人中,二甲双胍通常是首先使用的抗高血糖药物。然而,有 59.7%的患者在确诊时并未使用任何抗高血糖药物。HbA1c 和年龄预测抗高血糖药物的起始治疗;SCr 和年龄预测磺酰脲类药物的起始治疗。

相似文献

1
Initial antihyperglycemic drug therapy among 241 327 adults with newly identified diabetes from 2005 through 2010: a surveillance, prevention, and management of diabetes mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study.2005 年至 2010 年间,241327 例新诊断糖尿病成人患者的初始抗高血糖药物治疗:糖尿病监测、预防和管理(SUPREME-DM)研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Oct;47(10):1280-91. doi: 10.1177/1060028013503624.
2
Intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy among patients with incident diabetes: a Surveillance Prevention and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study.新发糖尿病患者强化降糖治疗:糖尿病监测预防与管理(SUPREME-DM)研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Jul;23(7):699-710. doi: 10.1002/pds.3610. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
3
Relationship of oral antihyperglycemic (sulfonylurea or metformin) medication adherence and hemoglobin A1c goal attainment for HMO patients enrolled in a diabetes disease management program.参与糖尿病疾病管理项目的健康维护组织(HMO)患者口服降糖药(磺脲类或二甲双胍)的服药依从性与糖化血红蛋白达标情况的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(6):466-71. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.6.466.
4
Baseline characteristic differences between patients prescribed sitagliptin vs. other oral antihyperglycemic agents: analysis of a US electronic medical record database.服用西他列汀与其他口服降糖药的患者基线特征差异:一项美国电子病历数据库分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jul;26(7):1697-703. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.489029.
5
Use of Antihyperglycemic Medications in U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.美国成年人使用抗高血糖药物情况分析:基于全国健康和营养调查的研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jun;43(6):1227-1233. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2424. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
6
Metformin-inclusive sulfonylurea therapy reduces the risk of Parkinson's disease occurring with Type 2 diabetes in a Taiwanese population cohort.二甲双胍联合磺脲类药物治疗可降低台湾人群队列 2 型糖尿病患者发生帕金森病的风险。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Jul;18(6):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
7
Diffusion into use of exenatide for glucose control in diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study of a new therapy.艾塞那肽在糖尿病血糖控制中的应用推广:一项新疗法的回顾性队列研究
Clin Ther. 2007 Aug;29(8):1784-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.08.021.
8
Impact of oral antihyperglycemic therapy on all-cause mortality among patients with diabetes in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局中口服降糖治疗对糖尿病患者全因死亡率的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jul;30(7):1689-93. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2272. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
9
Exenatide once weekly versus daily basal insulin as add-on treatment to metformin with or without a sulfonylurea: a retrospective pooled analysis in patients with poor glycemic control.西格列汀每周一次与每日基础胰岛素作为二甲双胍联合治疗的附加治疗,联合或不联合磺脲类药物:血糖控制不佳的患者的回顾性 pooled 分析。
Postgrad Med. 2013 Sep;125(5):101-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.09.2704.
10
No reduced risk of overall, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancer with metformin therapy in diabetic patients: database analyses from Germany and the UK.二甲双胍治疗糖尿病患者并不能降低总体、结直肠、肺、乳腺和前列腺癌的发病风险:来自德国和英国的数据库分析
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):865-74. doi: 10.1002/pds.3823. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Common Predictors of Multiple Adverse Outcomes Among Elderly Adults With Type-2 Diabetes.识别 2 型糖尿病老年患者多种不良结局的常见预测因素。
Med Care. 2019 Sep;57(9):702-709. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001159.
2
Relationships between Medication Adherence and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Control in Elderly Patients with Diabetes.老年糖尿病患者药物依从性与心血管疾病危险因素控制的关系。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Oct;37(10):1204-1214. doi: 10.1002/phar.1994. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
3
Sulfonylurea use and the risk of hospital readmission in patients with type 2 diabetes.
2型糖尿病患者使用磺脲类药物与再次入院风险
BMC Endocr Disord. 2016 Jan 20;16:4. doi: 10.1186/s12902-016-0084-z.
4
Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care.参与比较效益研究的利益相关者的方法:一种以患者为中心的改善糖尿病护理的方法。
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Jun;3(2):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
5
Health care system-level factors associated with performance on Medicare STAR adherence metrics in a large, integrated delivery system.在一个大型综合医疗服务体系中,与医疗保险星级评定依从性指标表现相关的医疗保健系统层面因素。
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):332-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000328.