参与比较效益研究的利益相关者的方法：一种以患者为中心的改善糖尿病护理的方法。
Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care.
机构信息
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
出版信息
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Jun;3(2):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
Abstract
Engaging stakeholders in the research process has the potential to improve quality of care and the patient care experience. Online patient community surveys can elicit important topic areas for comparative effectiveness research. Stakeholder meetings with substantial patient representation, as well as representation from health care delivery systems and research funding agencies, are a valuable tool for selecting and refining pilot research and quality improvement projects. Giving patient stakeholders a deciding vote in selecting pilot research topics helps ensure their 'voice' is heard. Researchers and health care leaders should continue to develop best-practices and strategies for increasing patient involvement in comparative effectiveness and delivery science research.
摘要
让利益相关者参与研究过程有可能改善医疗质量和患者的就医体验。在线患者社区调查可以引出比较有效性研究的重要主题领域。有大量患者代表以及来自医疗服务系统和研究资助机构的代表参加的利益相关者会议，是选择和完善试点研究和质量改进项目的一种有价值的工具。让患者利益相关者在选择试点研究课题方面拥有决定性投票权有助于确保他们的“声音”被听到。研究人员和医疗保健领导人应继续制定最佳实践和策略，以增加患者参与比较有效性和交付科学研究。
相似文献
1
Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care.
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Jun;3(2):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
2
Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Patient-centered Research Agenda: Lessons Learned From the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet).
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S27-S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000785.
3
Engaging parent-child dyad and healthcare provider stakeholders in a patient-centered comparative effectiveness study.
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jul;8(9):721-732. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0126. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Challenges encountered in the conduct of Optimal Health: A patient-centered comparative effectiveness study of interventions for adults with serious mental illness.
Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;14(1):5-16. doi: 10.1177/1740774516670895. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network.
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S22-S26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000778.
6
IMPACCT Kids' Care: a real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research.
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):351-7. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.24.
7
Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute.
Qual Life Res. 2015 May;24(5):1033-41. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0893-3. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
8
Engaging patients and caregivers to establish priorities for the management of diabetic foot ulcers.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;73(4):1388-1395.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.127. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
9
Understanding the Influence and Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-centered Outcomes Research: a Qualitative Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):6-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07104-w. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):165-170. doi: 10.1370/afm.2042.
引用本文的文献
1
Multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement in a type 2 diabetes comparative effectiveness study utilizing real-world data.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 29;8(1):e220. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.666. eCollection 2024.
2
Revisiting the hospital-issued gown in hospitalizations from a locus of control and patient-centered care perspectives: a call for design thinking.
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;12:1420919. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420919. eCollection 2024.
3
Changing the research paradigm for digital transformation in healthcare delivery.
Front Digit Health. 2022 Sep 6;4:911634. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.911634. eCollection 2022.
4
Designing an online intervention for adults with addictive eating: a qualitative integrated knowledge translation approach.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 7;12(6):e060196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060196.
5
Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022 Jan 17;9(1):35-45. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1828. eCollection 2022 Winter.
6
How mHealth can facilitate collaboration in diabetes care: qualitative analysis of co-design workshops.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1104. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05955-3.
7
A review and synthesis of frameworks for engagement in health research to identify concepts of knowledge user engagement.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0838-1.
8
PaTH to partnership in stakeholder-engaged research: A framework for stakeholder engagement in the PaTH to Health Diabetes study.
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Mar;8(1):100361. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 14.
9
Patient centered research to improve community involvement (PaRTICIpate) in diabetes self-management: a conference series for developing collaborations between researchers, stakeholders, and patients.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Oct 24;2(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0074-1.
10
Preliminary validation of a Urinary Symptom Questionnaire for individuals with Neuropathic Bladder using Intermittent Catheterization (USQNB-IC): A patient-centered patient reported outcome.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0197568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197568. eCollection 2018.
本文引用的文献
1
Ensuring Support for Research and Quality Improvement (QI) Networks: Four Pillars of Sustainability-An Emerging Framework.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Jan 17;1(1):1005. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1005. eCollection 2013.
2
Medicare Star excludes diabetes patients with poor CVD risk factor control.
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Dec 1;20(12):e573-81.
3
Implications of different laboratory-based incident diabetic kidney disease definitions on comparative effectiveness studies.
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jul;3(4):359-69. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.25.
4
Prescription medication burden in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes: a SUrveillance, PREvention, and ManagEment of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2014 Jul-Aug;54(4):374-82. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2014.13195.
5
Automating assessment of lifestyle counseling in electronic health records.
Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):457-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.001.
6
Stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: high-touch or high-tech?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Jun;14(3):335-44. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.901890. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy among patients with incident diabetes: a Surveillance Prevention and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Jul;23(7):699-710. doi: 10.1002/pds.3610. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
8
Feasibility of a web-based survey of hallucinations and assessment of visual function in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jan 6;3(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2744.
9
Initial antihyperglycemic drug therapy among 241 327 adults with newly identified diabetes from 2005 through 2010: a surveillance, prevention, and management of diabetes mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study.
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Oct;47(10):1280-91. doi: 10.1177/1060028013503624.
10
Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success?
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Sep;1(5):397-407. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.44.
Zotero 插件