• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创与开放骶骨阴道固定术30天手术结局的比较。

A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy.

作者信息

Tyson Mark D, Wolter Christopher E

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Feb;34(2):151-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.22522. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1002/nau.22522
PMID:24265258
Abstract

AIMS

Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) has gained widespread acceptance without randomized or population-based data to support its use. This study compares 30-day outcomes after MISC and open sacrocolpopexy (OSC) using population-based data.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to acquire 1,786 sacrocolpopexy operations (659 OSC and 1,127 MISC) performed from 2005 to 2011. A propensity-weighted comparative analysis of perioperative morbidity was performed.

RESULTS

Among women undergoing sacrocolpopexy, the proportion of MISC procedures increased from 7.1% in 2006 to 68.8% in 2011. Women undergoing OSC were older (P < 0.001) and had somewhat higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications (P = 0.11). Unadjusted comparisons between groups revealed higher rates of superficial (P < 0.001) and deep surgical (P = 0.009) site infections in the OSC group. There was also a higher rate of blood transfusions (P = 0.02), a longer length of hospitalization (P < 0.001), and a shorter operative time (P < 0.001) among patients undergoing OSC. In the propensity-weighted analysis, MISC was associated with lower rates of wound infections (1.1% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.01), lower blood transfusion rates (0.7% vs. 2.3%; P = 0.01), a shorter mean hospitalization (1.4 vs. 3.0 days; P < 0.001), and a longer mean operative time (224.8 vs. 188.6 min; P < 0.001). No differences were noted among renal, infectious, or neurologic complications, although pulmonary complications were higher in the OSC group (0.3% vs. 1.0%; P = 0.08). No differences in 30-day mortality were noted (0.1% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

MISC was associated with lower perioperative morbidity in this propensity-weighted analysis.

摘要

目的

微创骶骨阴道固定术(MISC)已获得广泛认可,但缺乏随机或基于人群的数据支持其应用。本研究使用基于人群的数据比较了MISC和开放性骶骨阴道固定术(OSC)术后30天的结局。

方法

利用国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库获取2005年至2011年期间进行的1786例骶骨阴道固定术(659例OSC和1127例MISC)。对围手术期发病率进行倾向加权比较分析。

结果

在接受骶骨阴道固定术的女性中,MISC手术的比例从2006年的7.1%增至2011年的68.8%。接受OSC的女性年龄更大(P<0.001),美国麻醉医师协会分级略高(P=0.11)。组间未经调整的比较显示,OSC组的表浅手术部位感染率(P<0.001)和深部手术部位感染率(P=0.009)更高。接受OSC的患者输血率也更高(P=0.02),住院时间更长(P<0.001),手术时间更短(P<0.001)。在倾向加权分析中,MISC与较低的伤口感染率(1.1%对3.0%;P=0.01)、较低的输血率(0.7%对2.3%;P=0.01)、较短的平均住院时间(1.4天对3.0天;P<0.001)以及较长的平均手术时间(224.8分钟对188.6分钟;P<0.001)相关。肾、感染或神经并发症方面未发现差异,尽管OSC组的肺部并发症更高(0.3%对1.0%;P=0.08)。30天死亡率无差异(0.1%对0.2%;P=0.61)。

结论

在本倾向加权分析中,MISC与较低的围手术期发病率相关。

相似文献

1
A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy.微创与开放骶骨阴道固定术30天手术结局的比较。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Feb;34(2):151-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.22522. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
2
A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.全国范围内经腹与经阴式骶骨阴道固定术围手术期结局的对比分析。
J Urol. 2018 Oct;200(4):862-867. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.131. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
3
A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.阴道穹窿脱垂围手术期结局的全国当代分析:微创骶棘韧带固定术与非网片阴道手术的比较
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep/Oct;25(5):342-346. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000678.
4
Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.微创骶骨阴道固定术与阴道网片修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的围手术期并发症:国家多机构数据集分析。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):72-77. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000738.
5
National Assessment of Advancing Age on Perioperative Morbidity and Length of Stay Associated With Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.高龄对与微创骶骨阴道固定术相关的围手术期发病率和住院时间的影响的全国性评估
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Nov/Dec;22(6):482-485. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000319.
6
Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.腹部及微创骶骨阴道固定术的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000036.
7
Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.基于同期子宫切除术入路的微创骶骨阴道固定术的围手术期结局:国家手术质量改进计划数据库的二次分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):953-958. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
8
A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.骶棘韧带固定术、子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术和微创骶骨阴道固定术的围手术期结局、再入院和再次手术比较。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Mar 1;27(3):133-139. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000999.
9
Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.利用国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库比较腹腔镜和机器人前列腺切除术与开放性前列腺切除术的围手术期结果。
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):579-83. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
10
Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.微创经腹阴道骶骨固定术后的围手术期不良事件。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):547.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.054. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.女性盆腔医学与重建手术中机器人手术的现状与未来
Turk J Urol. 2019 Sep 1;45(5):331-339. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19068. Print 2019 Sep.
2
Safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent rectopexy: peri-operative morbidity in a nationwide cohort.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术同期直肠固定术的安全性:全国队列研究中的围手术期发病率
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Mar;30(3):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3699-y. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
3
Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery.
阴道手术中的期望落空:缺乏适当的手术知情同意、目标和期望。
Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Dec;17(12):87. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0642-y.
4
Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放式骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道顶端脱垂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2765-y. Epub 2015 Aug 7.