Psychology Division, Institute of Education, University of Melbourne, 3052, Parkville, Australia.
J Youth Adolesc. 1990 Apr;19(2):133-47. doi: 10.1007/BF01538717.
This study concerns the prevalence of loneliness in a sample of adolescent Australian college students and examines the predictors of loneliness in this group, in particular the impact of social network characteristics, social network appraisal, the functions of friendship, and the psychosocial variables of identity and intimacy (Erikson, 1978) within the context of de Jong-Giervald's (1987) model of loneliness. One hundred and thirty- eight college students aged between 17 and 20 years from one regional and one city tertiary institution were surveyed to ascertain the level of experienced loneliness as measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russellet al., 1980). Measures of intimacy and identity were obtained using the Erikson Psychosocial State Inventory (Rosenthalet al., 1981) while the functions of friendship in general and of a specific same- sex close friend were those established in a previous study (Moore and Boldero, 1987). Comparison of the levels of loneliness reported with those found by other studies suggested that Australian adolescents are no less vulnerable to the experience of loneliness than their American counterparts. In addition, while no quantitative sex differences in loneliness were found, qualitative differences emerged. Specifically, although psychosocial intimacy was the best predictor of loneliness for both male and female, the other independent predictors were different. For males having fewer same- sex friends and an inability to share feelings with a specific same- sex friend predicted loneliness whereas for females social network appraisal, the ability to engage in mutual aid with a specific same-sex friend, living with family, and psychosocial identity were important. These differences were discussed in terms of the impact that the differential socialization of male and female has on ability of adolescents to engage in close and satisfying interpersonal relationships. Suggestions for intervention were made.
本研究关注澳大利亚青少年大学生样本中的孤独感流行情况,并研究了该群体中孤独感的预测因素,特别是社交网络特征、社交网络评价、友谊功能以及身份和亲密感的心理变量(埃里克森,1978 年)在德容-吉瓦尔德(1987 年)孤独模型的背景下。对来自一所地区性和一所城市大学的 138 名年龄在 17 至 20 岁的大学生进行了调查,以确定他们的孤独程度,使用的是加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(拉塞尔等人,1980 年)。亲密感和身份感的衡量标准采用埃里克森心理社会状态量表(罗森塔尔等人,1981 年),而一般友谊的功能和特定同性密友的功能则是以前的研究中确定的(摩尔和博尔德罗,1987 年)。将报告的孤独水平与其他研究发现的水平进行比较表明,澳大利亚青少年与美国青少年一样容易经历孤独感。此外,尽管孤独感方面没有发现定量性别差异,但出现了定性差异。具体来说,尽管心理社会亲密感是孤独感的最佳预测因素,但其他独立预测因素却不同。对于男性来说,同性朋友较少且无法与特定的同性朋友分享感受,这预示着孤独感;而对于女性来说,社交网络评价、与特定同性朋友进行相互帮助的能力、与家人同住以及心理社会身份是重要的。这些差异是根据男女不同的社会化对青少年参与亲密和满意的人际关系的能力的影响来讨论的。提出了干预建议。