* Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Crawford Gym, Room LL02B, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Exp Physiol. 2014 Mar;99(3):562-70. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.076406. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
The purpose of the study was to determine whether short-term high-intensity aerobic interval training improves resting pulmonary diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) and carbon monoxide (DLCO). Twenty-eight sedentary women [mean (SD) age 32 (11) years, body mass index 24.3 (5.7) kg m(-2)] were randomly assigned to either a self-directed moderate-intensity physical activity (n = 14) group or a supervised high-intensity aerobic interval training group (n = 14). The moderate physical activity group and the aerobic interval training group increased weekly physical activity energy expenditure by 800 and 1600 kcal week(-1), respectively. After 6 weeks, aerobic capacity increased to a similar exent in both groups (mean improvement 8%, effect size 0.39). The DLNO, but not DLCO, increased to a similar extent in both groups, by 4% or 3.0 (5.7) [95% confidence interval 0.8, 5.2] ml min(-1) mmHg(-1) m(-2) from pre- to post-training (effect size 0.27). There was no correlation between the change in aerobic capacity and the change in DLNO (P > 0.05) or between the change in aerobic capacity and the change in total weekly physical activity energy expenditure (P > 0.05). Interval training does not provide additional improvements in DLNO or aerobic capacity compared with self-directed moderate-intensity physical activity (4-6 metabolic equivalent tasks, 800 kcal week(-1), for 6 weeks) in unfit women. Despite the slight improvement in both DLNO and aerobic capacity, true meaningful physiological changes in these parameters remain questionable.
本研究旨在确定短期高强度间歇有氧训练是否能提高静息状态下一氧化氮(DLNO)和一氧化碳(DLCO)的肺弥散能力。28 名久坐的女性[平均(SD)年龄 32(11)岁,体重指数 24.3(5.7)kg/m2]被随机分配到自我指导的中等强度体力活动(n=14)组或监督的高强度有氧间歇训练组(n=14)。中等强度体力活动组和有氧间歇训练组每周的体力活动能量消耗分别增加了 800 和 1600 kcal/周。6 周后,两组的有氧能力都有类似程度的提高(平均提高 8%,效应量 0.39)。DLNO 而不是 DLCO,两组都有类似程度的提高,分别提高了 4%或 3.0(5.7)[95%置信区间 0.8,5.2]ml/min/mmHg/m2,从训练前到训练后(效应量 0.27)。有氧能力的变化与 DLNO 的变化之间没有相关性(P>0.05),有氧能力的变化与每周总体力活动能量消耗的变化之间也没有相关性(P>0.05)。与自我指导的中等强度体力活动(4-6 个代谢当量任务,800 千卡/周,持续 6 周)相比,间歇训练并不能为不适合运动的女性提供额外的 DLNO 或有氧能力的改善。尽管 DLNO 和有氧能力都有轻微的提高,但这些参数的真正有意义的生理变化仍然值得怀疑。