Brain Imaging and Modeling Section, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 11;7:649. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00649. eCollection 2013.
Recently, there have been a large number of studies using resting state fMRI to characterize abnormal brain connectivity in patients with a variety of neurological, psychiatric, and developmental disorders. However, interpreting what the differences in resting state fMRI functional connectivity (rsfMRI-FC) actually reflect in terms of the underlying neural pathology has proved to be elusive because of the complexity of brain anatomical connectivity. The same is the case for task-based fMRI studies. In the last few years, several groups have used large-scale neural modeling to help provide some insight into the relationship between brain anatomical connectivity and the corresponding patterns of fMRI-FC. In this paper we review several efforts at using large-scale neural modeling to investigate the relationship between structural connectivity and functional/effective connectivity to determine how alterations in structural connectivity are manifested in altered patterns of functional/effective connectivity. Because the alterations made in the anatomical connectivity between specific brain regions in the model are known in detail, one can use the results of these simulations to determine the corresponding alterations in rsfMRI-FC. Many of these simulation studies found that structural connectivity changes do not necessarily result in matching changes in functional/effective connectivity in the areas of structural modification. Often, it was observed that increases in functional/effective connectivity in the altered brain did not necessarily correspond to increases in the strength of the anatomical connection weights. Note that increases in rsfMRI-FC in patients have been interpreted in some cases as resulting from neural plasticity. These results suggest that this interpretation can be mistaken. The relevance of these simulation findings to the use of functional/effective fMRI connectivity as biomarkers for brain disorders is also discussed.
最近,有大量研究使用静息态 fMRI 来描述各种神经、精神和发育障碍患者的大脑连接异常。然而,由于大脑解剖连接的复杂性,解释静息态 fMRI 功能连接 (rsfMRI-FC) 的差异实际上反映了哪些潜在的神经病理学问题一直难以捉摸。基于任务的 fMRI 研究也是如此。在过去的几年中,有几个研究小组使用大规模神经建模来帮助深入了解大脑解剖连接和相应的 fMRI-FC 模式之间的关系。在本文中,我们回顾了使用大规模神经建模来研究结构连接和功能/有效连接之间关系的几种尝试,以确定结构连接的改变如何在功能/有效连接的改变模式中表现出来。由于模型中特定脑区之间的解剖连接的改变是已知的,因此可以使用这些模拟的结果来确定 rsfMRI-FC 的相应改变。许多这些模拟研究发现,结构连接的改变不一定会导致结构修改区域的功能/有效连接的匹配改变。通常,观察到改变后的大脑中的功能/有效连接增加并不一定对应于解剖连接权重的增强。请注意,在某些情况下,患者 rsfMRI-FC 的增加被解释为神经可塑性的结果。这些结果表明,这种解释可能是错误的。还讨论了这些模拟发现与将功能/有效 fMRI 连接用作大脑疾病生物标志物的相关性。