J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Nov 1;64(3):279-83. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e3182a97c39.
We performed a randomized controlled trial in 30 HIV-infected participants to either continue tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz (Continuation Group) or switch to tenofovir/emtricitabine/raltegravir (Switch Group) for 24 weeks. There were no significant differences in the changes in flow-mediated dilation, 25(OH) vitamin D, or parathyroid hormone levels. Total cholesterol, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum alkaline phosphatase, sCD14 levels, and renal function significantly declined in the Switch Group compared with the Continuation Group; however, sCD163 levels significantly increased in the Switch Group. These findings suggest that raltegravir is not inherently more beneficial to endothelial function compared with efavirenz but may impact renal function and monocyte activation.
我们在 30 名 HIV 感染者中进行了一项随机对照试验,将他们分为继续使用替诺福韦/恩曲他滨/依非韦伦(延续组)或换用替诺福韦/恩曲他滨/拉替拉韦(转换组),治疗 24 周。在血流介导的扩张、25(OH) 维生素 D 和甲状旁腺激素水平的变化方面,两组间无显著差异。与延续组相比,转换组的总胆固醇、高敏 C 反应蛋白、血清碱性磷酸酶、sCD14 水平和肾功能显著下降;而 sCD163 水平在转换组显著升高。这些发现表明,与依非韦伦相比,拉替拉韦并非固有地对血管内皮功能更有益,但可能会影响肾功能和单核细胞活化。