Suppr超能文献

从物种-面积关系估计灭绝:为什么数字加不起来。

Estimating extinction from species--area relationships: why the numbers do not add up.

机构信息

SYSU-Alberta Joint Lab for Biodiversity Conservation, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.

出版信息

Ecology. 2013 Sep;94(9):1905-12. doi: 10.1890/12-1795.1.

Abstract

Researchers commonly use species-area relationships (SAR) to estimate extinction rates caused by habitat loss by reversing the SAR, extrapolating backward from area to calculate expected species loss. We have previously shown that the backward SAR method considerably overestimates extinction rates due to a previously unrecognized sampling artifact. Jacob Bock Axelsen, Uri Roll, Lewi Stone, and Andrew Solow recently argued that the backward SAR method is correct and the method does not overestimate extinction rates. In this paper, we further elaborate and clarify our previous results. We show that the backward SAR method gives the correct extinction rate only under a strict complementary-area sampling design, which is not used in practice because it requires knowing which species are endemic to the area of destroyed habitat, or the number of species in the complementary area. Because of this problem, researchers substitute a power-law model for the SAR in the backward SAR equation. However, this substitution violates the backward SAR method's requirement for complementary sampling. With this model substitution, the backward SAR equation is no longer correct, except in the special case of randomly distributed species. For the complementary sampling or random distribution of species, the first individual of a species to be encountered and the last individual to be encountered to lose the species are exchangeable (or the same individual). But this is not the case for other sampling designs or if species are not randomly distributed and explains why the backward SAR method fails to correctly estimate extinction rates. Our proofs and results are general and explain the widely recognized overestimation of extinction by the backward SAR method. We suggest future directions for developing general theory for estimating species extinction from species-area relationships. Until then, however, the backward SAR method should not be used to estimate species extinction in practice.

摘要

研究人员通常使用物种-面积关系 (SAR) 通过反转 SAR 来估计因栖息地丧失而导致的灭绝率,从面积推断回推以计算预期的物种损失。我们之前已经表明,由于以前未被认识到的抽样假象,向后 SAR 方法大大高估了灭绝率。Jacob Bock Axelsen、Uri Roll、Lewi Stone 和 Andrew Solow 最近认为,向后 SAR 方法是正确的,并且该方法不会高估灭绝率。在本文中,我们进一步详细阐述和澄清了我们之前的结果。我们表明,只有在严格的互补区域采样设计下,向后 SAR 方法才能给出正确的灭绝率,而这种设计在实践中并未使用,因为它需要知道哪些物种是破坏栖息地区域的特有种,或者互补区域中的物种数量。由于这个问题,研究人员在向后 SAR 方程中用幂律模型替代 SAR。但是,这种替代违反了向后 SAR 方法对互补采样的要求。有了这种模型替代,向后 SAR 方程就不再正确,除非物种是随机分布的。对于互补采样或物种的随机分布,遇到的第一个物种个体和最后一个失去物种的个体是可交换的(或相同的个体)。但对于其他采样设计或如果物种不是随机分布的,则不是这种情况,这解释了为什么向后 SAR 方法无法正确估计灭绝率。我们的证明和结果是通用的,并解释了向后 SAR 方法广泛认识到的灭绝率高估的原因。我们为从物种-面积关系估计物种灭绝的一般理论的未来发展方向提出了建议。然而,在那之前,向后 SAR 方法不应在实践中用于估计物种灭绝。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验