Resource Environmental Associates Ltd., Markham, Ontario, Canada; School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Human Mobility Research Centre, Syl & Molly Apps Medical Research Centre, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Human Mobility Research Centre, Syl & Molly Apps Medical Research Centre, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Feb;24(1):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
Bilateral knee strength evaluations of unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient patients using isokinetic dynamometry are commonly performed in rehabilitation settings. The most frequently-used outcome measure is the peak moment value attained by the knee extensor and flexor muscle groups. However, other strength curve features may also be of clinical interest and utility. The purpose of this investigation was to identify, using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), strength curve features that explain the majority of variation between the injured and uninjured knee, and to assess the capabilities of these features to detect the presence of injury. A mixed gender cohort of 43 unilateral ACL deficient patients performed 6 continuous concentric knee extension and flexion repetitions bilaterally at 60°s(-1) and 180°s(-1) within a 90° range of motion. Moment waveforms were analyzed using PCA, and binary logistic regression was used to develop a discriminatory decision rule. For all directions and speeds, a statistically significant overall reduction in strength was noted for the involved knee in comparison to the uninvolved knee. The discriminatory decision rule yielded a specificity and sensitivity of 60.5% and 60.5%, respectively, corresponding to an accuracy of ∼62%. As such, the curve features extracted using PCA enabled only limited clinical usefulness in discerning between the ACL deficient and contra lateral, healthy knee. Improvement in discrimination capabilities may perhaps be achieved by consideration of different testing speeds and contraction modes, as well as utilization of other data analysis techniques.
在康复环境中,使用等速测力法对单侧前交叉韧带(ACL)缺失患者的双侧膝关节力量进行评估是很常见的。最常使用的结果测量是膝关节伸肌和屈肌肌群达到的峰值力矩值。然而,其他力量曲线特征也可能具有临床意义和实用性。本研究的目的是使用主成分分析(PCA)来确定能够解释受伤和未受伤膝关节之间大部分变化的力量曲线特征,并评估这些特征检测损伤存在的能力。一个由 43 名单侧 ACL 缺失患者组成的混合性别队列在 90°运动范围内以 60°s(-1)和 180°s(-1)的速度连续进行 6 次双侧同心膝关节伸展和屈曲重复运动。使用 PCA 分析力矩波形,并使用二元逻辑回归制定判别决策规则。对于所有方向和速度,与未受伤的膝关节相比,受伤膝关节的力量总体显著降低。判别决策规则的特异性和敏感性分别为 60.5%和 60.5%,准确率约为 62%。因此,PCA 提取的曲线特征仅在辨别 ACL 缺失和对侧健康膝关节方面具有有限的临床实用性。通过考虑不同的测试速度和收缩模式,以及使用其他数据分析技术,可能会提高判别能力。