• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症患者血流动力学监测与管理的最新进展

Update on hemodynamic monitoring and management in septic patients.

作者信息

Cecconi M, Arulkumaran N, Kilic J, Ebm C, Rhodes A

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St George's Hospital, London, UK -

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 Jun;80(6):701-11. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

PMID:24280808
Abstract

Severe sepsis and septic shock are associated with significant mortality. Effective management of this clinical syndrome includes early resuscitation with fluids and vasoactive drugs to maintain vital organ perfusion and oxygen delivery. Understanding the different approach to the management of sepsis during the resuscitation and ongoing management phases is essential to initiate context- and time-specific interventions. Manipulation of hemodynamic variables to achieve a balance between oxygen delivery and consumption forms the cornerstone of hemodynamic optimisation. Minimally invasive and completely non-invasive cardiac output monitors have been developed, but require validation in this specific cohort of patients. The trend in hemodynamic parameters is particularly important when any intervention to augment cardiac output is carried out (functional hemodynamic monitoring). Cardiac output monitors and surrogates of tissue oxygenation are only able to guide management, as patient outcome is determined by acquisition and interpretation of accurate data, and suitable management decisions.

摘要

严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克与显著的死亡率相关。对这种临床综合征的有效管理包括早期使用液体和血管活性药物进行复苏,以维持重要器官灌注和氧输送。了解在复苏和持续管理阶段脓毒症管理的不同方法对于启动针对具体情况和特定时间的干预措施至关重要。通过操纵血流动力学变量以实现氧输送和氧消耗之间的平衡是血流动力学优化的基石。已经开发出了微创和完全无创的心输出量监测仪,但需要在这一特定患者群体中进行验证。当进行任何增加心输出量的干预措施时(功能性血流动力学监测),血流动力学参数的趋势尤为重要。心输出量监测仪和组织氧合替代指标仅能指导管理,因为患者的预后取决于准确数据的获取和解读以及合适的管理决策。

相似文献

1
Update on hemodynamic monitoring and management in septic patients.脓毒症患者血流动力学监测与管理的最新进展
Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 Jun;80(6):701-11. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
2
Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill Patient - Current Status and Perspective.危重症患者血流动力学监测——现状与展望。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2015 Aug 3;2:44. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00044. eCollection 2015.
3
Hemodynamic monitoring in sepsis.脓毒症中的血流动力学监测。
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;23(1):149-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2010.12.009.
4
Tissue perfusion and oxygenation to monitor fluid responsiveness in critically ill, septic patients after initial resuscitation: a prospective observational study.在初始复苏后监测危重症脓毒症患者液体反应性的组织灌注与氧合:一项前瞻性观察性研究
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Dec;29(6):707-12. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9653-8. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
5
Hemodynamic optimization of sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion.脓毒症诱导的组织灌注不足的血流动力学优化
Crit Care. 2006;10 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S2. doi: 10.1186/cc4829.
6
Hemodynamic and oxygen transport monitoring to titrate therapy in septic shock.血流动力学和氧输送监测以滴定脓毒性休克的治疗。
New Horiz. 1993 Feb;1(1):145-59.
7
Hemodynamic monitoring in sepsis.脓毒症血流动力学监测。
Crit Care Clin. 2009 Oct;25(4):803-23, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2009.08.006.
8
[Guidelines of hemodynamic monitor and support in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (draft)].[成人严重脓毒症与脓毒性休克血流动力学监测与支持指南(草案)]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2007 Mar;19(3):129-33.
9
Distinct hemodynamic patterns of septic shock at presentation to pediatric intensive care.小儿重症监护室收治时脓毒性休克的不同血流动力学模式。
Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122(4):752-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1979.
10
Prompt antibiotic administration and goal-directed hemodynamic support in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者进行及时的抗生素治疗和目标导向的血流动力学支持。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Oct;13(5):586-91. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282e7d8e1.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of hemodynamic parameters derived by GE E-PiCCO in comparison with PiCCO® in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.GE E-PiCCO 衍生的血流动力学参数与 PiCCO® 在重症监护病房患者中的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 26;13(1):6861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34141-8.
2
How I personalize fluid therapy in septic shock?如何在感染性休克中进行个体化液体治疗?
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 24;27(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04363-3.
3
Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?液体反应性的预测。有什么新进展?
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 May 28;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8.
4
Toward an Electrical Analog of the Cardiovascular System in Hemorrhage.朝向出血中心血管系统的电气模拟。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2021 Oct;12(5):526-529. doi: 10.1007/s13239-021-00545-8. Epub 2021 May 20.
5
Assessment of method agreement between two minimally invasive hemodynamic measurements in septic shock patients on high doses of vasopressor drugs. A preliminary study.对高剂量血管加压药物治疗的感染性休克患者两种微创血流动力学测量方法之间一致性的评估。一项初步研究。
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Oct;24(2):89-100. doi: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.min.
6
Septic shock and the use of norepinephrine in an intermediate care unit: Mortality and adverse events.脓毒性休克及去甲肾上腺素在中级护理病房的应用:死亡率及不良事件
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183073. eCollection 2017.
7
Comparison of stroke volume measurement between non-invasive bioreactance and esophageal Doppler in patients undergoing major abdominal-pelvic surgery.非侵入性生物反应技术与食管多普勒测量在接受腹部-盆腔大手术患者中的心搏量比较。
J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):545-551. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2351-1. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
8
Fluid therapy for septic shock resuscitation: which fluid should be used?用于感染性休克复苏的液体疗法:应使用哪种液体?
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015 Jul-Sep;13(3):462-8. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082015RW3273. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
9
Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill Patient - Current Status and Perspective.危重症患者血流动力学监测——现状与展望。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2015 Aug 3;2:44. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00044. eCollection 2015.
10
Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.未校准脉搏波分析联合肺动脉导管在感染性休克患者中进行连续心输出量测量
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Feb;30(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9672-0. Epub 2015 Feb 27.