• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较剂量递增每周紫杉醇与标准剂量每周紫杉醇治疗既往治疗晚期胃癌患者的随机 II 期研究。

Randomised phase II study comparing dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel vs standard-dose weekly paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer.

机构信息

1] Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan [2] Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2014 Jan 21;110(2):271-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.726. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.726
PMID:24281004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3899763/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This randomised phase II trial compared dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) vs standard-dose wPTX for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Ninety patients were randomised to a standard dose of wPTX (80 mg m(-2)) or an escalated dose of wPTX (80-120 mg m(-2)) to assess the superiority of overall survival (OS) with a one-sided alpha error of 0.3 and a power of 0.8.

RESULTS

The median OS showed a trend towards longer survival in the dose-escalated arm (11.8 vs 9.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.75; one-sided P=0.12), although it was statistically not significant. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the dose-escalated arm (4.3 vs 2.5 months, HR, 0.55; P=0.017). Objective response rate was 30.3% with dose escalation and 17.1% with standard dose (P=0.2). The frequency of all grades of neutropenia was significantly higher with dose escalation (88.7% vs 60.0%, P=0.002); however, no significant difference was observed in the proportion of patients experiencing grade 3 or more (40.9% vs 31.1%, P=0.34).

CONCLUSION

Dose-escalated wPTX in patients with pretreated AGC met our predefined threshold of primary end point, OS (P<0.3); however, it did not show a significantly longer OS. Progression-free survival was significantly better with dose escalation.

摘要

背景

这项随机 2 期临床试验比较了剂量递增的每周紫杉醇(wPTX)与标准剂量 wPTX 治疗既往治疗过的晚期胃癌(AGC)患者的疗效。

方法

90 例患者被随机分为标准剂量 wPTX(80mg/m2)或递增剂量 wPTX(80-120mg/m2)组,以单侧 alpha 误差为 0.3 和功效为 0.8 来评估总生存期(OS)的优势。

结果

递增剂量组的中位 OS 显示出更长的生存趋势(11.8 个月 vs 9.6 个月;风险比(HR),0.75;单侧 P=0.12),尽管统计学上无显著性差异。递增剂量组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)明显更长(4.3 个月 vs 2.5 个月,HR,0.55;P=0.017)。递增剂量组的客观缓解率为 30.3%,标准剂量组为 17.1%(P=0.2)。递增剂量组的所有级别中性粒细胞减少症的发生率明显更高(88.7% vs 60.0%,P=0.002);然而,在发生 3 级或更高级别的患者比例方面没有观察到显著差异(40.9% vs 31.1%,P=0.34)。

结论

在既往治疗过的 AGC 患者中,递增剂量的 wPTX 达到了我们预先设定的主要终点 OS(P<0.3)的阈值;然而,它并没有显示出明显更长的 OS。递增剂量组的无进展生存期明显更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/c490c9b79a54/bjc2013726f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/586f78e8e1c5/bjc2013726f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/bc0a7728d9ef/bjc2013726f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/a1d508f4ad2f/bjc2013726f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/c490c9b79a54/bjc2013726f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/586f78e8e1c5/bjc2013726f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/bc0a7728d9ef/bjc2013726f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/a1d508f4ad2f/bjc2013726f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98dd/3899763/c490c9b79a54/bjc2013726f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomised phase II study comparing dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel vs standard-dose weekly paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer.一项比较剂量递增每周紫杉醇与标准剂量每周紫杉醇治疗既往治疗晚期胃癌患者的随机 II 期研究。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jan 21;110(2):271-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.726. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
2
Weekly paclitaxel plus ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy-the P-SELECT trial (WJOG10617G)-a randomised phase II trial by the West Japan Oncology Group.每周紫杉醇联合雷莫芦单抗对比每周nab-紫杉醇联合雷莫芦单抗治疗一线治疗失败的不可切除的晚期或复发性伴腹膜转移的胃癌:由日本西部肿瘤协作组(West Japan Oncology Group)开展的 P-SELECT 试验(WJOG10617G)-一项随机 II 期试验
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07047-1.
3
A phase II trial of dose-reduced nab-paclitaxel for patients with previously treated, advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (OGSG 1302).一项剂量减少的 nab-紫杉醇治疗既往治疗的晚期或复发性胃癌患者的 II 期临床试验(OGSG 1302)。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;25(12):2035-2043. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01768-w. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
4
Randomized phase II study of second-line chemotherapy with the best available 5-fluorouracil regimen versus weekly administration of paclitaxel in far advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastases refractory to 5-fluorouracil-containing regimens (JCOG0407).一项随机II期研究,比较最佳可用的含5-氟尿嘧啶方案二线化疗与每周给予紫杉醇用于对含5-氟尿嘧啶方案难治的伴有严重腹膜转移的晚期胃癌(JCOG0407)。
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):902-10. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0542-8. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
5
Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ABSOLUTE): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.奈达铂紫杉醇对比既往治疗的晚期胃癌患者中的溶剂型紫杉醇(ABSOLUTE):一项开放标签、随机、非劣效、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;2(4):277-287. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30219-9. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
6
Randomized phase II study comparing dose escalated weekly paclitaxel vs. standard dose weekly paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer.一项比较既往治疗的晚期胃癌患者接受剂量递增每周紫杉醇与标准剂量每周紫杉醇的随机 II 期研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb;41(2):287-90. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq206. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
7
Weekly paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer.紫杉醇每周治疗作为二线化疗用于晚期胃癌的日本患者。
Anticancer Res. 2013 Oct;33(10):4547-52.
8
Paclitaxel plus valproic acid versus paclitaxel alone as second- or third-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized Phase II trial.紫杉醇联合丙戊酸与单纯紫杉醇作为晚期胃癌二线或三线治疗的随机II期试验
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Jul 25;10:2353-8. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S110425. eCollection 2016.
9
Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.雷莫芦单抗联合紫杉醇对比安慰剂联合紫杉醇治疗既往治疗的晚期胃或胃食管结合部腺癌患者(RAINBOW):一项双盲、随机、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1224-35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
10
Efficacy and safety findings from DREAM: a phase III study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) versus i.v. paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy.DREAM 研究:在一线化疗失败的晚期胃癌患者中,口服紫杉醇 DHP107 与静脉注射紫杉醇的疗效和安全性研究。
Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1220-1226. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy055.

引用本文的文献

1
A phase I/II trial evaluating the safety of increased-dose S- 1 with oxaliplatin and nivolumab in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.一项评估增加剂量的S-1联合奥沙利铂和纳武单抗用于HER2阴性晚期胃癌安全性的I/II期试验。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14084-1.
2
Highly variable timing renders immunotherapy efficacy and toxicity impractical biomarkers of one another in clinical practice.在临床实践中,高度可变的时间使得免疫疗法的疗效和毒性成为彼此不切实际的生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 16;15:1351739. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1351739. eCollection 2024.
3
Nanoparticle Albumin‑Bound Paclitaxel and Solvent-Based Paclitaxel as Chemotherapy Options for Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial.随机、开放标签、III 期研究比较了伊立替康与紫杉醇在氟嘧啶加铂类化疗失败后无严重腹膜转移的晚期胃癌患者中的疗效:WJOG4007 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 10;31(35):4438-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5805. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
2
Correlation between overall survival and other endpoints in clinical trials of second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.二线化疗治疗晚期胃癌患者的临床试验中总生存期与其他终点的相关性。
Gastric Cancer. 2014 Apr;17(2):362-70. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0274-6. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
3
纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与溶剂型紫杉醇作为晚期胃癌患者化疗方案的系统评价和Meta分析
Cureus. 2023 Jul 11;15(7):e41711. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41711. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Clinical Outcomes for Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.经治晚期胃癌或胃食管结合部癌患者的临床结局:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Dec;54(4):1031-1045. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00932-5. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
A phase Ib/II study of regorafenib and paclitaxel in patients with beyond first-line advanced esophagogastric carcinoma (REPEAT).瑞戈非尼与紫杉醇用于一线治疗后的晚期食管胃癌患者的Ib/II期研究(REPEAT)
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Jun 28;14:17588359221109196. doi: 10.1177/17588359221109196. eCollection 2022.
6
Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis (CROSS SELL study).白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合雷莫芦单抗对比紫杉醇联合雷莫芦单抗二线治疗不可切除的晚期或复发性胃癌的多中心、倾向性评分匹配分析(CROSS SELL 研究)。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr;27(4):684-694. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02114-y. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
Toward a Treatment Sequencing Strategy: A Systematic Review of Treatment Regimens in Advanced Gastric Cancer/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.迈向治疗序贯策略:晚期胃癌/胃食管结合部腺癌治疗方案的系统评价。
Oncologist. 2021 Oct;26(10):e1704-e1729. doi: 10.1002/onco.13907. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Reduction of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after four weeks predicts the outcome of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.四周后衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的降低可预测接受转移性结直肠癌二线化疗患者的预后。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021 Apr;70(4):1115-1125. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02761-y. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Correlation between hematological parameters and outcome in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated by concomitant chemoradiotherapy.同期放化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌患者的血液学参数与预后的相关性。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(22):8432-8443. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3465. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
10
Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia as a Prognostic and Predictive Marker of Outcomes in Solid-Tumor Patients.化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症作为实体瘤患者预后和预测结果的标志物。
Drugs. 2018 May;78(7):737-745. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0909-3.
Comparison of docetaxel/cisplatin dosages of 75/60 and 60/60 mg/m(2) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.多西他赛/顺铂剂量75/60mg/m²与60/60mg/m²用于治疗非小细胞肺癌的比较。
Exp Ther Med. 2012 Aug;4(2):317-322. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.597. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
4
A genome-wide association study identifies novel loci for paclitaxel-induced sensory peripheral neuropathy in CALGB 40101.一项全基因组关联研究鉴定了用于 CALGB 40101 的紫杉醇诱导的感觉外周神经病变的新的基因座。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Sep 15;18(18):5099-109. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1590. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
5
Salvage chemotherapy for pretreated gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial comparing chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care alone.预处理后胃癌的挽救化疗:比较化疗联合最佳支持治疗与单纯最佳支持治疗的随机 III 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 1;30(13):1513-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4585. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
6
Common variants in ABCB1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 genes and clinical outcomes among women with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.ABCB1、ABCC2 和 ABCG2 基因常见变体与接受铂类和紫杉烷类化疗的晚期卵巢癌女性的临床结局:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.022. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
7
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: overview of 15 randomized trials.高剂量化疗联合自体造血干细胞支持作为乳腺癌辅助治疗:15 项随机试验概述。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 20;29(24):3214-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5910. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
8
Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO).伊立替康对比最佳支持治疗作为胃癌二线化疗的生存优势——德国肿瘤内科学会(AIO)的一项随机 III 期研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Oct;47(15):2306-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.002.
9
Meta-analysis of neutropenia or leukopenia as a prognostic factor in patients with malignant disease undergoing chemotherapy.中性粒细胞减少或白细胞减少作为恶性肿瘤化疗患者预后因素的荟萃分析。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;68(2):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1487-6. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
Effects of genetic polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene on clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer treated by second-line chemotherapy.ABCB1基因多态性对接受二线化疗的胃癌患者临床结局的影响。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(2):447-52.