• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹股沟疝手术报告质量:有待提高。

Quality of inguinal hernia operative reports: room for improvement.

机构信息

The Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2013 Dec;56(6):393-7. doi: 10.1503/cjs.017412.

DOI:10.1503/cjs.017412
PMID:24284146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3859781/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Operative reports (ORs) serve as the official documentation of surgical procedures. They are essential for optimal patient care, physician accountability and billing, and direction for clinical research and auditing. Nonstandardized narrative reports are often of poor quality and lacking in detail. We sought to audit the completeness of narrative inguinal hernia ORs.

METHODS

A standardized checklist for inguinal hernia repair (IHR) comprising 33 variables was developed by consensus of 4 surgeons. Five high-volume IHR surgeons categorized items as essential, preferable or nonessential. We audited ORs for open IHR at 6 academic hospitals.

RESULTS

We audited 213 ORs, and we excluded 7 femoral hernia ORs. Tension-free repairs were the most common (82.5%), and the plug-and-patch technique was the most frequent (52.9%). Residents dictated 59% of ORs. Of 33 variables, 15 were considered essential and, on average, 10.8 ± 1.3 were included. Poorly reported elements included first occurrence versus recurrent repair (8.3%), small bowel viability in incarcerated hernias (10.7%) and occurrence of intraoperative complications (32.5%). Of 18 nonessential elements, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, preoperative antibiotics and urgency were reported in 1.9%, 11.7% and 24.3% of ORs, respectively. Repair-specific details were reported in 0 to 97.1% of ORs, including patch sutured to tubercle (55.1%) and location of plug (67.0%).

CONCLUSION

Completeness of IHR ORs varied with regards to essential and nonessential items but were generally incomplete, suggesting there is opportunity for improvement, including implementation of a standardized synoptic OR.

摘要

背景

手术报告(OR)是手术过程的官方记录。它们对于提供最佳的患者护理、医生问责和计费、临床研究和审核方向至关重要。非标准化的叙述报告往往质量较差,缺乏细节。我们旨在审查叙述性腹股沟疝 OR 的完整性。

方法

通过 4 位外科医生的共识,制定了一个包含 33 个变量的腹股沟疝修复(IHR)标准化检查表。5 位高容量 IHR 外科医生将项目分为必要、可取或非必要。我们在 6 家学术医院审查了开放 IHR 的 OR。

结果

我们审查了 213 份 OR,排除了 7 份股疝 OR。无张力修复是最常见的(82.5%),Plug-and-Patch 技术最常见(52.9%)。住院医师口述了 59%的 OR。在 33 个变量中,有 15 个被认为是必要的,平均有 10.8±1.3 个变量被包括在内。报告较差的元素包括初次修复与复发性修复(8.3%)、嵌顿疝中小肠的活力(10.7%)和术中并发症的发生(32.5%)。在 18 个非必要元素中,深静脉血栓形成预防、术前抗生素和紧急情况分别在 1.9%、11.7%和 24.3%的 OR 中报告。修复特异性细节在 0 到 97.1%的 OR 中报告,包括补丁缝合到结节(55.1%)和塞子的位置(67.0%)。

结论

IHR OR 在必要和非必要项目方面的完整性各不相同,但总体上不够完整,这表明有改进的空间,包括实施标准化的概要 OR。

相似文献

1
Quality of inguinal hernia operative reports: room for improvement.腹股沟疝手术报告质量:有待提高。
Can J Surg. 2013 Dec;56(6):393-7. doi: 10.1503/cjs.017412.
2
Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in patients with obesity: an American College of Surgeons NSQIP clinical outcomes analysis.肥胖患者腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划临床结果分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1305-1310. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5112-6. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
[Tension-free procedures in the surgical treatment of groin hernias].[腹股沟疝手术治疗中的无张力手术方法]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2003 Jan-Feb;131(1-2):82-91. doi: 10.2298/sarh0302082m.
4
A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.改良腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)是腹股沟疝和股疝的标准手术:一项对1123例疝修补术的17年回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3208-9. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
5
The results of open preperitoneal prosthetic mesh repair for acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia: a retrospective study of 146 cases.开放式腹膜前补片修补术治疗急性嵌顿或绞窄性腹股沟疝的结果:146 例回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):47-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06729-7. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
Preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia at open radical prostatectomy.开放性根治性前列腺切除术时腹股沟疝的腹膜前修补术。
Hernia. 2009 Oct;13(5):517-22. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0507-0. Epub 2009 May 6.
7
Prospective, multicenter, pairwise analysis of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: early results from the Prospective Hernia Study.前瞻性、多中心、机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术与开放和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的配对分析:前瞻性疝研究的早期结果。
Hernia. 2020 Oct;24(5):1069-1081. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02224-4. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
8
Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications.开放手术与腹腔镜下单侧腹股沟疝修补术:确定降低并发症的理想体重指数
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):206-214. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4958-y. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Reoperation for inguinal hernia recurrence in Ontario: a population-based study.安大略省腹股沟疝复发的再次手术:一项基于人群的研究。
Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1822-0. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
10
Preliminary results of a two-layered prosthetic repair for recurrent inguinal and ventral hernias combining open and laparoscopic techniques.一种结合开放和腹腔镜技术的两层人工修复复发性腹股沟疝和腹疝的初步结果。
Hernia. 2006 Jun;10(3):253-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0085-3. Epub 2006 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the quality and standards of operative notes in general surgery; A teaching institute's experience in Pakistan.评估普通外科手术记录的质量和标准:巴基斯坦一所教学机构的经验
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1837-1840. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9443.
2
Adequate Reporting Among Ventral Hernia Repair Operative Reports: A Cross-Sectional Study of Prevalence of Details and Association With Clinical Outcomes.腹疝修补手术报告中的充分报告:关于细节发生率及其与临床结果关联的横断面研究
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Apr 23;5(2):e425. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000425. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Enhancing Documentation Precision in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project.提高眼科手术记录的精确性:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 29;15(12):e51274. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51274. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Assessment of manual operation note documentation practice: a cross-sectional study.手工操作记录文件记录实践的评估:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Aug 7;86(1):92-97. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001124. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Surgeon accuracy and interrater reliability when interpreting CT scans after ventral hernia repair.腹外疝修补术后 CT 扫描解读时外科医生的准确性和组内可靠性。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):347-351. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02710-x. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
Implementation of a synoptic operative note for abdominal wall hernia repair: a statewide pilot evaluating completeness and communication of intraoperative details.实施腹壁疝修补术概要手术记录:评估术中细节完整性和沟通的全州范围试点研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3610-3618. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08614-8. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Comparison of Systematic Video Documentation With Narrative Operative Report in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.结直肠癌手术中系统视频记录与叙事手术报告的比较。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):381-389. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5246.
8
Imaging for Quality Control: Comparison of Systematic Video Recording to the Operative Note in Colorectal Cancer Surgery. A Pilot Study.用于质量控制的成像:结直肠癌手术中系统视频记录与手术记录的比较。一项初步研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):798-803. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5563-y. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
9
Current practice of neonatal resuscitation documentation in North America: a multi-center retrospective chart review.北美新生儿复苏记录的当前实践:一项多中心回顾性图表审查。
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Nov 14;15:184. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0503-8.

本文引用的文献

1
What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?直肠癌概要报告的引入对专业胃肠和非胃肠病理学家报告结果有何影响?
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Nov;135(11):1471-5. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2010-0558-OA.
2
The computerized synoptic operative report: a novel tool in surgical residency education.计算机化概要手术报告:外科住院医师培训教育中的一种新工具。
Arch Surg. 2012 Jan;147(1):71-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.228. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
3
Operative reports: form and function.手术报告:形式与功能。
Arch Surg. 2010 Sep;145(9):865-71. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.157.
4
Electronic synoptic operative reporting: assessing the reliability and completeness of synoptic reports for pancreatic resection.电子手术综合报告:评估胰腺切除术综合报告的可靠性和完整性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Sep;211(3):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
5
Early experience using an online reporting system for interventional radiology procedure-related complications integrated with a digital dictation system.早期使用在线报告系统报告介入放射学操作相关并发症的经验,该系统与数字语音听写系统集成。
J Digit Imaging. 2011 Aug;24(4):672-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9319-0.
6
Synoptic operative record for point of care outcomes: a leap forward in knowledge translation.即时手术记录用于即时医疗结果:知识转化的一大飞跃。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;36 Suppl 1:S44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
7
Improvement in the accuracy of reporting key prognostic and anatomic findings during thyroidectomy by using a novel Web-based synoptic operative reporting system.通过使用一种新型的基于网络的概要手术报告系统,提高甲状腺切除术中关键预后和解剖学发现报告的准确性。
Surgery. 2009 Dec;146(6):1090-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.032.
8
Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.标准化概要癌症病理报告:基于人群的方法。
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun 15;99(8):517-24. doi: 10.1002/jso.21282.
9
Opening the black box of cancer surgery quality: WebSMR and the Alberta experience.打开癌症手术质量的黑匣子:WebSMR与艾伯塔省的经验。
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun 15;99(8):525-30. doi: 10.1002/jso.21266.
10
Pathological reporting of colorectal cancer specimens: a retrospective survey in an academic Canadian pathology department.结直肠癌标本的病理报告:加拿大一所学术性病理科的回顾性调查
Can J Surg. 2008 Aug;51(4):284-8.