Squartini Tiziano, van Lelyveld Iman, Garlaschelli Diego
Instituut-Lorentz for Theoretical Physics, Leiden Institute of Physics, University of Leiden, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep. 2013 Nov 28;3:3357. doi: 10.1038/srep03357.
The financial crisis clearly illustrated the importance of characterizing the level of 'systemic' risk associated with an entire credit network, rather than with single institutions. However, the interplay between financial distress and topological changes is still poorly understood. Here we analyze the quarterly interbank exposures among Dutch banks over the period 1998-2008, ending with the crisis. After controlling for the link density, many topological properties display an abrupt change in 2008, providing a clear - but unpredictable - signature of the crisis. By contrast, if the heterogeneity of banks' connectivity is controlled for, the same properties show a gradual transition to the crisis, starting in 2005 and preceded by an even earlier period during which anomalous debt loops could have led to the underestimation of counter-party risk. These early-warning signals are undetectable if the network is reconstructed from partial bank-specific data, as routinely done. We discuss important implications for bank regulatory policies.
金融危机清楚地表明了描述与整个信贷网络而非单个机构相关的“系统性”风险水平的重要性。然而,金融困境与拓扑变化之间的相互作用仍未得到充分理解。在此,我们分析了1998年至2008年期间荷兰银行间的季度同业拆借敞口,以危机结束。在控制了链接密度之后,许多拓扑性质在2008年出现了突然变化,为危机提供了一个清晰但不可预测的特征。相比之下,如果控制银行连通性的异质性,相同的性质则显示出从2005年开始向危机的逐渐转变,在此之前还有一个更早的时期,在此期间异常的债务循环可能导致了对交易对手风险的低估。如果像通常那样根据部分特定银行的数据重建网络,这些早期预警信号是无法检测到的。我们讨论了对银行监管政策的重要影响。