Suppr超能文献

“赋予青年发言权”问卷是否是儿科肿瘤学中以青少年为中心护理的合适衡量标准:拉施测量理论分析

Is the Give Youth a Voice questionnaire an appropriate measure of teen-centred care in paediatric oncology: a Rasch measurement theory analysis.

作者信息

Klassen Anne F, Cano Stefan J, Sinha Roona, Shahbaz Areej, Klaassen Robert, Dix David

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Clinical Neurology Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1686-97. doi: 10.1111/hex.12161. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adolescents have their own views about the cancer care they receive and how they feel they are treated, but their opinions are rarely solicited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the 56-item Give Youth a Voice (GYV-56), its subscales and its 20-item short-form, are clinically meaningful and psychometrically sound instruments that can be used to measure teen-centred care (TCC) in paediatric oncology.

DESIGN

Qualitative interviews and a questionnaire survey.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Qualitative interviews with 38 childhood cancer survivors. GYV-56 data collected from 200 paediatric cancer patients and survivors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The GYV-56, which measures the following four aspects of service delivery: Supportive and respectful relationships; Information sharing and communication; Supporting independence; and Teen-centred services.

RESULTS

Qualitative data provided broad support for the TCC conceptual framework and GYV-56 items. After post-hoc reduction of the response options from 7 to 3 (to correct for disordered thresholds), fit to the Rasch model was good, most items showed acceptable fit residuals and chi-square P-values, scale reliability were supported and item locations defined a continuum for TCC that was well-targeted to the sample. By calibrating the items for each subscale and the short-form to the full scale, the scores obtained on each measure are directly comparable.

CONCLUSION

Our study found initial support for use of the GYV with a reduced response option format for examining TCC in the adolescent oncology patients. in this paediatric population. Further research using the GYV is needed to elaborate upon our findings.

摘要

背景

青少年对他们所接受的癌症护理以及他们对自身治疗感受有自己的看法,但他们的意见很少被征求。

目的

确定包含56个条目的“倾听青少年心声”(GYV - 56)量表、其分量表以及20个条目的简版量表是否为具有临床意义且心理测量学上可靠的工具,可用于衡量儿科肿瘤学中以青少年为中心的护理(TCC)。

设计

定性访谈和问卷调查。

地点与参与者

对38名儿童癌症幸存者进行定性访谈。从200名儿科癌症患者及幸存者处收集GYV - 56数据。

主要结局指标

GYV - 56量表,用于测量服务提供的以下四个方面:支持性和尊重性的关系;信息共享与沟通;支持独立性;以及以青少年为中心的服务。

结果

定性数据为TCC概念框架和GYV - 56条目提供了广泛支持。在将应答选项从7个事后缩减为3个(以校正无序阈值)后,与拉施模型的拟合良好,大多数条目显示出可接受的拟合残差和卡方P值,量表信度得到支持,条目位置定义了一个针对样本的TCC连续体且目标明确。通过将每个分量表和简版量表的条目校准到完整量表,在每个测量上获得的分数可直接比较。

结论

我们的研究初步支持使用应答选项格式缩减的GYV量表来检查青少年肿瘤患者的TCC情况。在这个儿科人群中,需要使用GYV进行进一步研究以详细阐述我们的发现。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Rating scales and Rasch measurement.量表和 Rasch 测量。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Oct;11(5):571-85. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.59.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验