Scholl Isabelle, Nicolai Jennifer, Pahlke Stephanie, Kriston Levente, Krupat Edward, Härter Martin
Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
To translate a measure of physicians' communication skills, the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS), into German, to examine its psychometric properties, and to analyze its association with the OPTION Scale, which assesses physicians' shared decision making (SDM) behavior.
We performed a secondary data analysis of 67 audio-recorded medical consultations. Reliability, internal consistency, and factorial validity of the translated 4HCS were analyzed. The association with the OPTION Scale was examined using correlation and linear regression.
Testing of reliability revealed intraclass correlation coefficients above .70. Results regarding internal consistency and factorial validity were inconclusive. The correlations between the OPTION score and the four dimensions of the 4HCS were .04 (p=.782), -.14 (p=.303), -.15 (p=.279) and .55 (p<.001), respectively. In multiple regression the four dimensions of the 4HCS explained substantial amount of variation in the OPTION scores (R(2)=.42, P<.001).
The measure showed good observer reliability, however further testing is necessary. Due to the strong interrelation of both measures, SDM should be seen in the context of broader communication skills.
The 4HCS can be used in research and medical education. Further studies are necessary that investigate SDM within the context of communication skills.
将一种衡量医生沟通技巧的方法——四习惯编码方案(4HCS)翻译成德语,检验其心理测量特性,并分析其与评估医生共同决策(SDM)行为的OPTION量表之间的关联。
我们对67次医学咨询的音频记录进行了二次数据分析。分析了翻译后的4HCS的信度、内部一致性和因子效度。使用相关性和线性回归检验与OPTION量表的关联。
信度测试显示组内相关系数高于0.70。关于内部一致性和因子效度的结果尚无定论。OPTION得分与4HCS的四个维度之间的相关性分别为0.04(p = 0.782)、-0.14(p = 0.303)、-0.15(p = 0.279)和0.55(p < 0.001)。在多元回归中,4HCS的四个维度解释了OPTION得分的大量变异(R² = 0.42,P < 0.001)。
该测量方法显示出良好的观察者信度,但仍需进一步测试。由于两种测量方法之间的紧密相互关系,应在更广泛的沟通技巧背景下看待SDM。
4HCS可用于研究和医学教育。有必要进行进一步的研究,在沟通技巧背景下调查SDM。