Suppr超能文献

德语版Observer OPTION的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of the German version of Observer OPTION.

作者信息

Kölker Mara, Topp Janine, Elwyn Glyn, Härter Martin, Scholl Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, W26, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 31;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2891-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order to conduct studies on shared decision-making (SDM) and to implement SDM in routine practice, psychometrically tested measures are needed. The development of the short 5-item version of the OPTION scale (Observer OPTION) allows to assess SDM from an observer perspective. Observer OPTION is so far only available in English and Dutch. The aim of this study was to translate the Observer OPTION rating scale into German and to test its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The German Observer OPTION was tested in a secondary data analysis of audio-recordings of patient-physician-consultations (N = 79) in German primary care practices. Demographic data were analysed using descriptive statistics. To assess inter- and intra-rater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. For assessing concurrent validity, a correlation (Spearman's Rho) of the sum score of Observer OPTION and Observer OPTION was calculated.

RESULTS

The consultations dealt with decisions regarding type 2 diabetes (N = 31), chronic back pain (N = 23), depression (N = 20), and other diseases (N = 5). Analysis of inter-rater reliability yielded an ICC of 0.82 for the sum score; across the five single items ICCs ranged between 0.45 and 0.77. For the intra-rater reliability an ICC of 0.83 was observed for the total score; across the five single items ICCs ranged between 0.45 and 0.86. The Observer OPTION had a mean total score of 11.84 (SD = 11.92) and the Observer OPTION had a mean total score of 10.3 (SD = 7.9), both on a potential range of 0 to 100. The correlation between the total scores of Observer OPTION and Observer OPTION was r = 0.47 (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results regarding inter- and intra-rater reliability were excellent on the total score level. Observer OPTION showed moderate concurrent validity using Observer OPTON. The results are generally comparable to the results of the original English version of Observer OPTION. The German version of Observer OPTION can be used in research and evaluation of clinical practice. Nevertheless, further testing is adviced.

摘要

背景

为了开展关于共同决策(SDM)的研究并将其应用于常规实践,需要经过心理测量测试的测量工具。简短的5项版OPTION量表(观察者OPTION)的开发使得能够从观察者的角度评估共同决策。到目前为止,观察者OPTION仅提供英文和荷兰文版本。本研究的目的是将观察者OPTION评分量表翻译成德文并测试其心理测量特性。

方法

在对德国初级保健机构中患者-医生咨询的音频记录(N = 79)进行二次数据分析时,对德文版观察者OPTION进行了测试。使用描述性统计分析人口统计学数据。为了评估评分者间和评分者内的信度,计算了组内相关系数(ICC)。为了评估同时效度,计算了观察者OPTION总分与观察者OPTION总分之间的相关性(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数)。

结果

这些咨询涉及2型糖尿病(N = 31)、慢性背痛(N = 23)、抑郁症(N = 20)和其他疾病(N = 5)的决策。评分者间信度分析得出总分的ICC为0.82;在五个单项中,ICC范围在0.45至0.77之间。对于评分者内信度,总分的ICC为0.83;在五个单项中,ICC范围在0.45至0.86之间。观察者OPTION的平均总分为11.84(标准差 = 11.92),观察者OPTION的平均总分为10.3(标准差 = 7.9),两者的潜在范围均为0至100。观察者OPTION总分与观察者OPTION总分之间的相关性为r = 0.47(p = 0.01)。

结论

在总分水平上,评分者间和评分者内信度的结果非常好。使用观察者OPTION时,观察者OPTION显示出中等程度的同时效度。结果总体上与观察者OPTION原始英文版的结果相当。德文版观察者OPTION可用于临床实践的研究和评估。尽管如此,建议进一步测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/5793363/99720dbe9239/12913_2018_2891_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验