Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1466-1476. doi: 10.1111/hex.13130. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
Measurement of physicians' competence in shared decision making (SDM) remains challenging with frequent disagreement between assessment methods.
To conceptualize and measure physicians' SDM competence as an organized network of behavioural skills and to determine whether processing patient-reported data according to this model can be used to predict observer-rated competence.
Secondary analysis of an observational study.
Primary and specialty outpatient care physicians and consecutively recruited adult patients with a chronic condition who faced a treatment decision with multiple acceptable choices.
Network parameters constructed from patients' assessment of physicians' SDM skills as measured by the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and observer-rated SDM competence of physicians measured by three widely used observer-rated instruments.
29 physicians (12 female, 17 male; mean age 50.3 years) recruited 310 patients (59.4% female, 40.6% male; mean age 54.0 years) facing a decision mainly regarding type 2 diabetes (36.4%), chronic back pain (32.8%) or depressive disorder (26.8%). Although most investigated skills were interrelated, elicitation of the patient's treatment preferences showed the strongest associations with the other skills. Network parameters of this skill were also decisive in predicting observer-rated competence. Correlation between predicted competence scores and observer-rated measurements ranged from 0.710 to 0.785.
Conceptualizing physicians' SDM competence as a network of interacting skills enables the measurement of observer-rated competence using patient-reported data. In addition to theoretical implications for defining and training medical competences, the findings open a new way to measure physicians' SDM competence under routine conditions.
由于评估方法之间经常存在分歧,衡量医生在共同决策(SDM)方面的能力仍然具有挑战性。
将医生的 SDM 能力概念化为行为技能的有组织网络,并确定根据该模型处理患者报告的数据是否可用于预测观察者评定的能力。
观察性研究的二次分析。
初级和专科门诊医生和连续招募的患有慢性疾病的成年患者,他们面临着有多种可接受选择的治疗决策。
使用 9 项共享决策问卷调查(SDM-Q-9)评估患者对医生 SDM 技能的评估和三个广泛使用的观察者评估工具评估医生的 SDM 能力,构建网络参数。
29 名医生(12 名女性,17 名男性;平均年龄 50.3 岁)招募了 310 名患者(59.4%女性,40.6%男性;平均年龄 54.0 岁),主要面临 2 型糖尿病(36.4%)、慢性腰痛(32.8%)或抑郁障碍(26.8%)的决策。尽管大多数研究技能相互关联,但患者治疗偏好的引出与其他技能具有最强的关联。该技能的网络参数也对预测观察者评定的能力具有决定性作用。预测能力评分与观察者评定测量之间的相关性范围为 0.710 至 0.785。
将医生的 SDM 能力概念化为相互作用的技能网络,使使用患者报告的数据能够测量观察者评定的能力。除了对定义和培训医学能力的理论意义外,这些发现还为在常规情况下测量医生的 SDM 能力开辟了新途径。