Suppr超能文献

双膦酸盐类药物治疗原发性骨质疏松症的胃肠道安全性比较:一项网状Meta分析

Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tadrous M, Wong L, Mamdani M M, Juurlink D N, Krahn M D, Lévesque L E, Cadarette S M

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3M2, Canada,

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2014 Apr;25(4):1225-35. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2576-2. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We completed a network meta-analysis of published papers to compare bisphosphonate gastrointestinal safety. We found that zoledronic acid had the highest chance of causing gastrointestinal adverse events. Etidronate had the highest chance of discontinuation due to an adverse event. No difference was found for serious adverse events.

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates are first-line treatment for osteoporosis. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AE) are the primary reason for non-adherence. Little is known about the comparative GI safety of bisphosphonates.

PURPOSE

Leverage published clinical trial data to examine the comparative GI safety of bisphosphonates.

METHODS

We completed a systematic review of all English-language clinical trials that assessed bisphosphonate safety and/or efficacy in primary osteoporosis through to 2012. Randomized, blinded, and controlled studies were eligible. The primary outcome was any GI-related AE. Subanalyses were completed for upper GI symptoms, serious GI, nausea, esophageal-related events, and discontinuation due to AE. A Bayesian-based network meta-analysis was completed to allow for indirect comparisons. Results were reported as the probability that a specific drug had the highest number of events.

RESULTS

We identified 50 studies: 32 alendronate, 12 risedronate, 5 etidronate, and 7 zoledronic acid. Zoledronic acid had the highest probability of having the highest number of any GI AE (91%) and nausea (70%). Etidronate (70%) and zoledronic acid (28%) had the highest probability of having the greatest attrition due to AE. Etidronate had the highest probability (56%) of having the greatest number of upper GI symptoms among oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid had the highest probability of causing the greatest number of GI AE, possibly related to nausea. These results question the assumption that annual zoledronic acid will translate into better adherence. Little difference was found between alendronate and risedronate for serious AE. More research into real-world implications of the comparative safety of bisphosphonates is needed.

摘要

未标注

我们对已发表的论文进行了网络荟萃分析,以比较双膦酸盐类药物的胃肠道安全性。我们发现唑来膦酸导致胃肠道不良事件的可能性最高。依替膦酸因不良事件停药的可能性最高。在严重不良事件方面未发现差异。

引言

双膦酸盐类药物是骨质疏松症的一线治疗药物。胃肠道(GI)不良事件(AE)是导致患者不依从治疗的主要原因。关于双膦酸盐类药物相对胃肠道安全性的了解甚少。

目的

利用已发表的临床试验数据来研究双膦酸盐类药物的相对胃肠道安全性。

方法

我们对截至2012年评估双膦酸盐类药物在原发性骨质疏松症中安全性和/或疗效的所有英文临床试验进行了系统评价。随机、盲法和对照研究符合要求。主要结局是任何与胃肠道相关的不良事件。对上消化道症状、严重胃肠道不良事件、恶心、食管相关事件以及因不良事件停药进行了亚组分析。完成了基于贝叶斯的网络荟萃分析以进行间接比较。结果报告为特定药物不良事件数量最多的概率。

结果

我们识别出50项研究:32项关于阿仑膦酸钠,12项关于利塞膦酸钠,5项关于依替膦酸,7项关于唑来膦酸。唑来膦酸出现任何胃肠道不良事件数量最多的概率最高(91%),恶心的概率最高(70%)。依替膦酸(70%)和唑来膦酸(28%)因不良事件导致脱落率最高的概率最高。在口服双膦酸盐类药物中,依替膦酸出现上消化道症状数量最多的概率最高(56%)。

结论

唑来膦酸导致胃肠道不良事件数量最多的概率最高,可能与恶心有关。这些结果对每年使用唑来膦酸会带来更好依从性的假设提出了质疑。在严重不良事件方面,阿仑膦酸钠和利塞膦酸钠之间差异不大。需要对双膦酸盐类药物相对安全性的实际影响进行更多研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验