Samuel Douglas B, Widiger Thomas A
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine.
Personal Ment Health. 2011 Feb;5(1). doi: 10.1002/pmh.152.
An active line of current investigation is how the five-factor model (FFM) of personality disorder might be applied by clinicians and particularly, how clinically useful this model is in comparison to the existing nomenclature. The current study is the first to investigate the temporal consistency of clinicians' application of the FFM and the to their own patients. Results indicated that FFM ratings were relatively stable over six-months of treatment, supporting their use by clinicians, but also indexed potentially important clinical changes. Additionally, ratings of utility provided by the clinicians suggested that the FFM was more useful for clinical decision making than was the model. We understand the clinical utility findings within the context of previous research indicating that the FFM is most useful among patients who are not prototypic for a personality disorder.
当前一个活跃的研究方向是临床医生如何应用人格障碍的五因素模型(FFM),尤其是与现有的命名法相比,该模型在临床上有多大用处。本研究首次调查了临床医生应用FFM对自己患者的时间一致性。结果表明,在六个月的治疗过程中,FFM评分相对稳定,这支持了临床医生对其的使用,但也指出了潜在的重要临床变化。此外,临床医生给出的效用评分表明,FFM在临床决策中比[此处原文缺失具体模型名称]模型更有用。我们结合之前的研究来理解临床效用研究结果,之前的研究表明,FFM在非人格障碍典型患者中最有用。