Suppr超能文献

家长和临床医生对儿童呼吸道感染互动手册的看法:EQUIP 随机对照试验的定性过程评价。

Parents' and clinicians' views of an interactive booklet about respiratory tract infections in children: a qualitative process evaluation of the EQUIP randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Dec 1;14:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-182.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

'When should I worry?' is an interactive booklet for parents of children presenting with respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care and associated training for clinicians. A randomised controlled trial (the EQUIP study) demonstrated that this intervention reduced antibiotic prescribing and future consulting intentions. The aims of this qualitative process evaluation were to understand how acceptable the intervention was to clinicians and parents, how it was implemented, the mechanisms for any observed effects, and contextual factors that could have influenced its effects.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 parents and 13 clinicians who participated in the trial. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using a framework approach, which involved five stages; familiarisation, development of a thematic framework, indexing, charting, and interpretation.

RESULTS

Most parents and clinicians reported that the 'When should I worry' interactive booklet (and online training for clinicians) was easy to use and valuable. Information on recognising signs of serious illness and the usual duration of illness were most valued. The interactive use of the booklet during consultations was considered to be important, but this did not always happen. Clinicians reported lack of time, lack of familiarity with using the booklet, and difficulty in modifying their treatment plan/style of consultation as barriers to use. Increased knowledge and confidence amongst clinicians and patients were seen as key components that contributed to the reductions in antibiotic prescribing and intention to consult seen in the trial. This was particularly pertinent in a context where decisions about the safe and appropriate management of childhood RTIs were viewed as complex and parents reported frequently receiving inconsistent messages.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'When should I worry' booklet, which is effective in reducing antibiotic prescribing, has high acceptability for clinicians and parents, helps address gaps in knowledge, increases confidence, and provides a consistent message. However, it is not always implemented as intended. Plans for wider implementation of the intervention in health care settings would need to address clinician-related barriers to implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN46104365.

摘要

背景

“我什么时候该担心?”是为在初级保健中出现呼吸道感染 (RTI) 的儿童的父母提供的互动手册,以及为临床医生提供的相关培训。一项随机对照试验(EQUIP 研究)表明,该干预措施减少了抗生素的使用和未来的咨询意向。本定性过程评估的目的是了解干预措施对临床医生和父母的可接受程度、实施情况、观察到的任何效果的机制,以及可能影响其效果的环境因素。

方法

对参与试验的 20 名父母和 13 名临床医生进行了半结构式访谈。对访谈进行了录音和逐字转录。使用框架方法对数据进行了分析,该方法包括五个阶段:熟悉、主题框架的制定、索引、图表和解释。

结果

大多数父母和临床医生报告说,“我什么时候该担心?”互动手册(以及针对临床医生的在线培训)易于使用且具有价值。他们最看重的是识别严重疾病迹象和疾病通常持续时间的信息。在咨询期间互动使用手册被认为很重要,但这并不总是发生。临床医生报告称,缺乏时间、不熟悉使用手册以及难以改变他们的治疗计划/咨询风格是使用的障碍。临床医生和患者知识的增加和信心的增强被视为减少试验中所见抗生素使用和咨询意向的关键因素。在这种情况下,有关儿童 RTI 的安全和适当管理的决策被认为是复杂的,并且父母经常报告收到不一致的信息,这一点尤其重要。

结论

“我什么时候该担心?”这本有助于减少抗生素使用的手册,对临床医生和父母来说具有很高的可接受性,有助于解决知识差距,增强信心,并提供一致的信息。然而,它并不总是按照预期实施。在医疗保健环境中更广泛地实施该干预措施的计划需要解决与临床医生相关的实施障碍。

试验注册

ISRCTN46104365。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing antibiotic prescribing rates in young children in an outpatient primary care setting-a systemwide quality improvement initiative.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Apr 2;7(2):dlaf041. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf041. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Behavioural impact of antibiotic stewardship in children in primary care: interviews with GPs and parents.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Dec 17;6(6):dlae207. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae207. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Let's Talk About Antibiotics: a randomised trial of two interventions to reduce antibiotic misuse.
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):e049258. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049258.

本文引用的文献

2
Putting antibiotic prescribing for children into context.
JAMA. 2013 Jun 12;309(22):2388-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6288.
3
Medicinal relationships: caring conversation.
Med Educ. 2013 May;47(5):443-52. doi: 10.1111/medu.12104.
6
How patients want their doctor to communicate. A literature review on primary care patients' perspective.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Mar;90(3):297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
8
'The body gets used to them': patients' interpretations of antibiotic resistance and the implications for containment strategies.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jul;27(7):766-72. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1916-1. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验