• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系列:公众参与研究。第 4 部分:最大限度地提高公众参与研究实施的好处。

Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation.

机构信息

Impact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthritis Primary Care Centre, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.

Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2243037. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037.

DOI:10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037
PMID:37609798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10448833/
Abstract

This final article in the four-part series focuses on the often neglected yet important role of the public in implementing research in General Practice and Primary Care more broadly. Experience in implementation of findings from research with public engagement in Primary Care has highlighted how partnership working with patients and the public is important in transitioning from 'what we know' from the evidence-base to 'what we do' in practice. Factors related to Primary Care research that make public engagement important are highlighted e.g. implementing complex interventions, implementing interventions that increase health equity, implementing interventions in countries with different primary healthcare system strengths. Involvement of patients and public can enhance the development of modelling and simulation included in studies on systems modelling for improving health services. We draw on the emerging evidence base to describe public engagement in implementation and offer some guiding principles for engaging with the public in the implementation in General Practice and Primary Care in general. Illustrative case studies are included to support others wishing to offer meaningful engagement in implementing research evidence.

摘要

这是四部分系列文章的最后一篇,重点关注公众在更广泛地实施全科医学和初级保健研究方面经常被忽视但却很重要的作用。在初级保健中通过公众参与实施研究结果的经验突出了与患者和公众合作的重要性,因为这有助于从证据基础上的“我们所知”过渡到实践中的“我们所做”。强调了与初级保健研究相关的使公众参与变得重要的因素,例如实施复杂干预措施、实施增加健康公平的干预措施、在具有不同初级卫生保健系统优势的国家实施干预措施。患者和公众的参与可以增强系统建模研究中建模和模拟的发展,从而改善卫生服务。我们借鉴新兴的证据基础来描述实施过程中的公众参与,并为一般意义上的全科医学和初级保健中的实施提供一些与公众进行合作的指导原则。本文还包括了一些说明性案例研究,以支持那些希望在实施研究证据方面进行有意义的参与的人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/10448833/01abab6d69b2/IGEN_A_2243037_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/10448833/01abab6d69b2/IGEN_A_2243037_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/10448833/01abab6d69b2/IGEN_A_2243037_F0001_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation.系列:公众参与研究。第 4 部分:最大限度地提高公众参与研究实施的好处。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2243037. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
6
Tuberculosis结核病
7
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
8
Co-designing person-centred quality indicator implementation for primary care in Alberta: a consensus study.共同设计艾伯塔省初级保健中以患者为中心的质量指标实施方案:一项共识研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 8;8(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00397-z.
9
Patient and public involvement in implementation of evidence-based guidance for musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review of current advances and gaps.患者和公众参与肌肉骨骼疾病循证指南的实施:对当前进展与差距的范围综述
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Oct 22;6(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00310-x.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
2
A Training Program to Support Patient Engagement in Primary Health Care Research: Co-Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Study.一项支持患者参与初级卫生保健研究的培训计划:协同设计、实施与评估研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Jun 5;17:e65485. doi: 10.2196/65485.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study.优化实践社区中的知识传播过程:一项(多方法)定性研究的建议
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jan 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00384-1.
2
The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review.利用共同生产、共同设计和共同创作来调动健康状况管理中的知识:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y.
3
Understanding the uptake of a clinical innovation for osteoarthritis in primary care: a qualitative study of knowledge mobilisation using the i-PARIHS framework.
Digital Information Exchange Between the Public and Researchers in Health Studies: Scoping Review.
健康研究中公众与研究人员之间的数字信息交流:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 28;27:e63373. doi: 10.2196/63373.
4
Looking back at the EJGP in 2023: What a rich harvest of relevant publications for primary care medicine!回顾2023年的《欧洲全科医学杂志》:初级保健医学相关出版物收获颇丰!
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2353237. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2353237. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Using Twitter (X) to Mobilize Knowledge for First Contact Physiotherapists: Qualitative Study.利用 Twitter(X)调动知识以助力一线理疗师:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 8;26:e55680. doi: 10.2196/55680.
6
Series: Public engagement with research. Part 1: The fundamentals of public engagement with research.系列:研究的公众参与。第 1 部分:研究的公众参与基础。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2232111. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2232111.
理解初级保健中骨关节炎临床创新的应用:应用 i-PARIHS 框架进行的知识转化定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 28;15(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01055-2.
4
Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes.情境在实施科学中很重要:对描述实施结果情境决定因素的决定因素框架的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 25;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3.
5
'Collective making' as knowledge mobilisation: the contribution of participatory design in the co-creation of knowledge in healthcare.作为知识动员的“集体创造”:参与式设计在医疗保健知识共同创造中的贡献。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 25;18(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3397-y.
6
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
7
Patient and public involvement in primary care research - an example of ensuring its sustainability.患者及公众参与初级医疗研究——确保其可持续性的一个实例
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jan 14;2:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0015-1. eCollection 2016.
8
Implementing core NICE guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care with a model consultation (MOSAICS): a cluster randomised controlled trial.实施初级保健中骨关节炎的核心 NICE 指南与模型咨询(MOSAICS):一项集群随机对照试验。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Jan;26(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of duloxetine added to usual care for patients with chronic pain due to hip or knee osteoarthritis: protocol of a pragmatic open-label cluster randomised trial (the DUO trial).度洛西汀添加到髋或膝骨关节炎慢性疼痛患者常规护理中的有效性和成本效益:一项实用的开放标签整群随机试验方案(DUO试验)
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;7(9):e018661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018661.
10
Identifying and overcoming implementation challenges: Experience of 59 noninstitutional long-term services and support pilot programs in the Veterans Health Administration.识别和克服实施挑战:退伍军人健康管理局 59 个非机构长期服务和支持试点项目的经验。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Jul/Sep;43(3):193-205. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000152.