Felder E, Fauler M, Geiler S
Institute for General Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany;
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Dec;37(4):337-42. doi: 10.1152/advan.00158.2012.
Retrieval of information has substantially changed within the last two decades. Naturally, this has also affected learning/teaching techniques, and methods that are commonly referred to as "e-learning" have become an important part in modern education. Institutions have to decide if (and how) to implement this new form of teaching but face the problem that little subject-specific research has been published for different teaching modes and methods. The present study compares a course module of the physiology laboratory course for medical students in the preclinical phase before and after the introduction of computer-aided course instructions (CACI). Students were provided with an online questionnaire containing Likert items evaluating workspace redesign, acceptance of course instructions, incentive to actively participate in the course, and subjective gain of knowledge. CACI was clearly preferred over the previously used paper workbook. However, the questionnaire also revealed that the gain in knowledge, as subjectively perceived by the students, had not improved, which is in agreement with several studies that neglected a beneficial effect of e-learning on learning success. We conclude that the CACI meet today's student's expectations and that introducing this system seems justified from this perspective.
在过去二十年中,信息检索方式发生了巨大变化。自然而然地,这也影响了学习/教学技术,那些通常被称为“电子学习”的方法已成为现代教育的重要组成部分。各院校必须决定是否(以及如何)采用这种新的教学形式,但面临的问题是,针对不同教学模式和方法的特定学科研究很少。本研究比较了在引入计算机辅助课程指导(CACI)之前和之后,临床前阶段医学生生理学实验课程的一个课程模块。向学生提供了一份在线问卷,其中包含李克特量表项目,用于评估工作空间重新设计、对课程指导的接受程度、积极参与课程的动力以及主观知识收获。与之前使用的纸质练习册相比,学生明显更喜欢CACI。然而,问卷还显示,学生主观感受到的知识收获并未提高,这与一些忽视电子学习对学习成绩有益影响的研究结果一致。我们得出结论,CACI符合当今学生的期望,从这个角度来看,引入该系统似乎是合理的。