• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stakeholder perspectives and values when setting waterbird population targets: implications for flyway management planning in a European context.制定水鸟种群目标时的利益相关者观点和价值观:对欧洲范围内迁徙路线管理规划的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 26;8(11):e81836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081836. eCollection 2013.
2
Implementation of the first adaptive management plan for a European migratory waterbird population: The case of the Svalbard pink-footed goose Anser brachyrhynchus.欧洲迁徙水鸟种群首个适应性管理计划的实施:斯瓦尔巴德粉脚雁(Anser brachyrhynchus)的案例
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):275-289. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0888-0.
3
Human perspectives and conservation of grizzly bears in Banff National Park, Canada.加拿大班夫国家公园灰熊的人类视角和保护。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Jun;26(3):420-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01856.x.
4
Wintering waterbirds in a large river floodplain: Hydrological connectivity is the key for reconciling development and conservation.在大型河流漫滩中越冬的水鸟:水文连通性是协调发展与保护的关键。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 15;573:645-660. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.147. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
5
Projected Impacts of Climate, Urbanization, Water Management, and Wetland Restoration on Waterbird Habitat in California's Central Valley.气候、城市化、水资源管理及湿地恢复对加利福尼亚中央谷地水鸟栖息地的预计影响
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169780. eCollection 2017.
6
Adaptive management of animal populations with significant unknowns and uncertainties: a case study.具有重大未知和不确定性的动物种群的适应性管理:案例研究。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Jul;28(5):1325-1341. doi: 10.1002/eap.1734. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
7
Crucial sites and environmental variables for wintering migratory waterbird population distributions in the natural wetlands in East Dongting Lake, China.中国东洞庭湖自然湿地越冬水鸟种群分布的关键地点和环境变量。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 10;655:147-157. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.185. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
8
Stakeholder contributions to assessment, monitoring, and conservation of threatened species: black skimmer and red knot as case studies.利益相关者对濒危物种评估、监测和保护的贡献:以黑腹燕鸥和红腹滨鹬为例
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Feb;189(2):60. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5731-3. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
9
Rapid climate driven shifts in wintering distributions of three common waterbird species.冬季三种常见水鸟物种分布因快速气候变化而发生变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jul;19(7):2071-81. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12200. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
10
Response of wintering waterbird diversity to reclamation history and post-reclamation habitat along Yellow Sea coast.黄海沿海围垦历史和围垦后生境对越冬水鸟多样性的响应。
Integr Zool. 2020 Nov;15(6):595-602. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12464. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Setting population-size targets for geese causing socio-economic conflicts.设定导致社会经济冲突的鹅类种群数量目标。
Ambio. 2022 Jan;51(1):209-225. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01539-5. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
Implementation of the first adaptive management plan for a European migratory waterbird population: The case of the Svalbard pink-footed goose Anser brachyrhynchus.欧洲迁徙水鸟种群首个适应性管理计划的实施:斯瓦尔巴德粉脚雁(Anser brachyrhynchus)的案例
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):275-289. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0888-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Soft systems thinking and social learning for adaptive management.软系统思维与社会学习在适应性管理中的应用。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Feb;26(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01755.x. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
2
The how-much-is-enough myth.“多少才够”的谬论。
Conserv Biol. 2008 Jun;22(3):514-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00926.x. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

制定水鸟种群目标时的利益相关者观点和价值观:对欧洲范围内迁徙路线管理规划的影响。

Stakeholder perspectives and values when setting waterbird population targets: implications for flyway management planning in a European context.

机构信息

Arctic Research Centre, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark ; Communications & Systems Department, The Open University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 26;8(11):e81836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081836. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0081836
PMID:24303076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3841130/
Abstract

Managing and controlling wildlife species within Europe is an acknowledged part of conservation management, yet deciding and setting a population target in order to control a population is perceived to be conceptually very challenging. We interviewed stakeholders, within a variety of governmental and non-governmental organizations, to evaluate their perspectives about setting population targets as part of waterbird management for controlling population sizes. We conclude that the setting of a quantifiable population target is beneficial as a measurable objective for monitoring and evaluating management actions. However, it must be recognised as just one possible measurable objective and there may well be multiple supporting objectives that encapsulate the management aims of different stakeholders. When considering wide-scale control of waterbirds species, where it is likely that population size matters, any population target should be coupled to the issues being addressed. We highlight that it is important to actively engage with stakeholders as part of the decision-making process, not only to gain consensus but to share knowledge. A clear understanding of the context and the rationale for controlling a waterbird species is needed to align the interests of diverse stakeholders. The provision of scientific data and the continuous monitoring of management actions is viewed as beneficial and demanded by stakeholders, as part of any decision-making process when setting population targets. This facilitates effective evaluation of management actions, helping managers make wise decisions as well as enabling the continued development of management plans.

摘要

在欧洲,管理和控制野生动物物种是保护管理的公认部分,但为了控制种群而决定和设定种群目标被认为在概念上极具挑战性。我们采访了政府和非政府组织内的利益相关者,以评估他们对设定水鸟管理中控制种群规模的种群目标的看法。我们的结论是,设定可量化的种群目标作为监测和评估管理措施的可衡量目标是有益的。然而,必须认识到这只是可能的多个可衡量目标之一,并且可能有多个支持目标,其中包含了不同利益相关者的管理目标。当考虑对水鸟物种进行大规模控制时,由于种群大小可能很重要,因此任何种群目标都应与要解决的问题相关联。我们强调,在决策过程中积极与利益相关者接触非常重要,不仅可以达成共识,还可以分享知识。为了使不同利益相关者的利益保持一致,需要对控制水鸟物种的背景和基本原理有清晰的了解。提供科学数据和对管理措施的持续监测被视为有益的,并被利益相关者所要求,这是设定种群目标时进行任何决策过程的一部分。这有助于对管理措施进行有效评估,帮助管理者做出明智的决策,并使管理计划得以持续发展。