• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于临床决策支持的基于工作流的数据协调:以结直肠癌筛查和监测为例

Workflow-based Data Reconciliation for Clinical Decision Support: Case of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance.

作者信息

Wagholikar Kavishwar, Sohn Sunghwan, Wu Stephen, Kaggal Vinod, Buehler Sheila, Greenes Robert A, Wu Tsung-Teh, Larson David, Liu Hongfang, Chaudhry Rajeev, Boardman Lisa

机构信息

Biomedical Statistics and Informatics.

出版信息

AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013 Mar 18;2013:269-73. eCollection 2013.

PMID:24303280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3845748/
Abstract

A major barrier for computer-based clinical decision support (CDS), is the difficulty in obtaining the patient information required for decision making. The information gap is often due to deficiencies in the clinical documentation. One approach to address this gap is to gather and reconcile data from related documents or data sources. In this paper we consider the case of a CDS system for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. We describe the use of workflow analysis to design data reconciliation processes. Further, we perform a quantitative analysis of the impact of these processes on system performance using a dataset of 106 patients. Results show that data reconciliation considerably improves the performance of the system. Our study demonstrates that, workflow-based data reconciliation can play a vital role in designing new-generation CDS systems that are based on complex guideline models and use natural language processing (NLP) to obtain patient data.

摘要

基于计算机的临床决策支持(CDS)的一个主要障碍是难以获取决策所需的患者信息。信息差距往往是由于临床文档存在缺陷。解决这一差距的一种方法是从相关文档或数据源收集并核对数据。在本文中,我们考虑用于结直肠癌筛查和监测的CDS系统的情况。我们描述了如何使用工作流分析来设计数据核对流程。此外,我们使用106名患者的数据集对这些流程对系统性能的影响进行了定量分析。结果表明,数据核对显著提高了系统性能。我们的研究表明,基于工作流的数据核对在设计基于复杂指南模型并使用自然语言处理(NLP)来获取患者数据的新一代CDS系统中可以发挥至关重要的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b961/3845748/990e44ce7ba0/amia_cri_2013_269f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b961/3845748/990e44ce7ba0/amia_cri_2013_269f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b961/3845748/990e44ce7ba0/amia_cri_2013_269f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Workflow-based Data Reconciliation for Clinical Decision Support: Case of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance.用于临床决策支持的基于工作流的数据协调:以结直肠癌筛查和监测为例
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013 Mar 18;2013:269-73. eCollection 2013.
2
Information Engineering and Workflow Design in a Clinical Decision Support System for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Iran.伊朗结直肠癌筛查临床决策支持系统中的信息工程与工作流程设计
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6605-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6605.
3
Clinical decision support with natural language processing facilitates determination of colonoscopy surveillance intervals.自然语言处理的临床决策支持有助于确定结肠镜检查的监测间隔。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;12(7):1130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.025. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
4
Development and dissemination of clinical decision support across institutions: standardization and sharing of refugee health screening modules.跨机构的临床决策支持的开发和传播:难民健康筛查模块的标准化和共享。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1515-1524. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz124.
5
Design of admission medication reconciliation technology: a human factors approach to requirements and prototyping.入院用药重整技术设计:以人为因素为基础的需求与原型设计方法。
HERD. 2013 Spring;6(3):30-48. doi: 10.1177/193758671300600304.
6
Design of a medication reconciliation application: facilitating clinician-focused decision making with data from multiple sources.设计一个药物重整应用程序:利用来自多个来源的数据促进以临床医生为中心的决策。
Appl Clin Inform. 2013 Mar 13;4(1):110-25. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-12-RA-0057. Print 2013.
7
Perceived barriers and facilitators of using a Web-based interactive decision aid for colorectal cancer screening in community practice settings: findings from focus groups with primary care clinicians and medical office staff.社区实践环境中使用基于网络的交互式决策辅助工具进行结直肠癌筛查的感知障碍与促进因素:来自与基层医疗临床医生和医疗办公室工作人员焦点小组的研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 18;15(12):e286. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2914.
8
Workshop on using natural language processing applications for enhancing clinical decision making: an executive summary.自然语言处理应用程序在增强临床决策中的应用研讨会:执行摘要。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e2-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001896. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Impact of errors in paper-based and computerized diabetes management with decision support for hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. A post-hoc analysis of a before and after study.基于纸质和计算机化的糖尿病管理中的错误对2型糖尿病住院患者决策支持的影响。一项前后研究的事后分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jun;90:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
10
Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening.患者在接受结直肠癌筛查转诊后的需求。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Feb;56(2):271-280. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Research Data Sharing Networks to Clinical App Sharing Networks.从不断发展的研究数据共享网络到临床应用共享网络。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2017 Jul 26;2017:302-307. eCollection 2017.
2
Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.利用从乳腺钼靶报告中自动提取的信息进行决策支持。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Aug;62:224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
3
Automated recommendation for cervical cancer screening and surveillance.宫颈癌筛查与监测的自动化推荐

本文引用的文献

1
Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.电子健康记录数据质量评估的方法和维度:为临床研究提供可重用性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):144-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
2
Assessing Electronic Note Quality Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9).使用医师文档质量工具(PDQI-9)评估电子病历质量。
Appl Clin Inform. 2012;3(2):164-174. doi: 10.4338/aci-2011-11-ra-0070.
3
Cancer screening - United States, 2010.
Cancer Inform. 2014 Oct 15;13(Suppl 3):1-6. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S14035. eCollection 2014.
4
Formative evaluation of the accuracy of a clinical decision support system for cervical cancer screening.宫颈癌筛查临床决策支持系统准确性的形成性评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):749-57. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001613. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
癌症筛查 - 美国,2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Jan 27;61(3):41-5.
4
Provider acceptance, safety, and effectiveness of a computer-based decision tool for colonoscopy preparation.基于计算机的结肠镜检查准备决策工具的提供者接受度、安全性和有效性。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Oct;80(10):726-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.07.001.
5
Clinician attitudes toward and use of electronic problem lists: a thematic analysis.临床医生对电子问题清单的态度和使用:主题分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 May 25;11:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-36.
6
Summarization of clinical information: a conceptual model.临床信息总结:概念模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Aug;44(4):688-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
7
Natural language processing improves identification of colorectal cancer testing in the electronic medical record.自然语言处理提高电子病历中结直肠癌检测的识别能力。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):188-97. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11400418. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
8
Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation.临床笔记数据:结构与灵活记录之间的紧张关系之观点。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):181-6. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.007237. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
9
A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies.健康信息系统研究系统评价综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):637-45. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004838.
10
Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review.遍历工作流研究的诸多路径:通过系统文献回顾开发工作流术语的概念框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):265-73. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004333.