Department of Agricultural Botany, J.V. College, Baraut, India.
Theor Appl Genet. 1979 Jan;54(1):33-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00265705.
The efficiency of three analyses, namely, Designs I and II of Comstock and Robinson (1952) and standard Design III analysis of Kearsey and Jinks (1968), was compared in the F2s of three wheat crosses (Norteno 67 x HD 1982, HD 1982 x Moti and Sonalika x Moti) for plant height, spikelets per spike and yield per plant. The three analyses showed a remarkable agreement in estimating the additive (D) component for all three characters in all three crosses. But, as regards the estimation of dominance ] (H) component, standard Design III analysis proved to be more efficient than the other two analyses in crosses 2 (HD 1982 x Moti) and 3 (Sonalika x Moti) for all three characters except spikelets per spike in cross 3.
比较了三种分析方法的效率，即 Comstock 和 Robinson（1952）的设计 I 和 II 以及 Kearsey 和 Jinks（1968）的标准设计 III 分析，在三个小麦杂交种（Norteno 67 x HD 1982、HD 1982 x Moti 和 Sonalika x Moti）的 F2 代中，对株高、小穗数和单株产量进行了分析。这三种分析方法在估计所有三个杂交种的所有三个性状的加性（D）分量方面表现出显著的一致性。但是，关于显性（H）分量的估计，标准设计 III 分析在除了杂交种 3（Sonalika x Moti）的小穗数之外，对于所有三个性状，在杂交种 2（HD 1982 x Moti）和 3（Sonalika x Moti）中都比其他两种分析方法更有效。
