Johnston Stephen S, Wilson Kathleen, Huang Alice, Smith David, Varker Helen, Turpcu Adam
Truven Health Analytics, 7700 Old Georgetown Rd, Ste 650, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA,
Adv Ther. 2013 Dec;30(12):1111-27. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0078-4. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
This study compared the number of, and expenditures on, first-line intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections between patients who were treated with aflibercept or ranibizumab for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
This was a retrospective cohort study based on U.S. administrative claims data. Selected patients had initiated first-line intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment with ranibizumab or aflibercept (index date) between November 18, 2011 and April 30, 2013, were aged ≥ 18 years on the index date, had 12 months of continuous insurance enrollment prior to the index date (baseline period), were diagnosed with wet AMD during the baseline period or on the index date, and had at least 6 or 12 months of follow-up enrollment after the index date without switching to a different anti-VEGF agent (follow-up periods). Outcomes measured within the 6 and 12 month follow-up periods included the number of, and healthcare expenditures on, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Multivariable regressions compared the outcomes between aflibercept and ranibizumab.
The 6 months analyses included 319 aflibercept patients and 1,054 ranibizumab patients (12 month analyses: 57 and 374, respectively). Over the first 6 months after the index date, neither the number of injections (aflibercept mean = 3.8 ± 1.6; ranibizumab mean = 3.9 ± 1.9) nor the expenditures on injections (aflibercept mean = $7,468 ± $4,211; ranibizumab mean = $7,816 ± $4,834) differed significantly between aflibercept patients and ranibizumab patients (in multivariable regression treating ranibizumab as reference: incidence rate ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.03, P = 0.277; cost ratio = 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.04, P = 0.338). Differences were also insignificant in the 12 month analyses. The overall mean days between injections differed by only 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.3) days between the aflibercept patients and ranibizumab patients (42.4 and 40.6, respectively).
Aflibercept and ranibizumab were used at a similar frequency resulting in similar intravitreal anti-VEGF injection healthcare expenditures among wet AMD patients initiating first-line intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment.
本研究比较了接受阿柏西普或雷珠单抗治疗湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者的一线玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)注射次数及费用。
这是一项基于美国行政索赔数据的回顾性队列研究。入选患者在2011年11月18日至2013年4月30日期间开始使用雷珠单抗或阿柏西普进行一线玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗(索引日期),索引日期时年龄≥18岁,在索引日期前有12个月的连续保险参保记录(基线期),在基线期或索引日期被诊断为湿性AMD,且在索引日期后有至少6个月或12个月的随访参保记录且未换用其他抗VEGF药物(随访期)。在6个月和12个月随访期内测量的结果包括玻璃体内抗VEGF注射次数及医疗费用。多变量回归比较了阿柏西普和雷珠单抗的结果。
6个月分析纳入了319例阿柏西普患者和1054例雷珠单抗患者(12个月分析分别为57例和374例)。在索引日期后的前6个月,阿柏西普患者和雷珠单抗患者的注射次数(阿柏西普平均=3.8±1.6;雷珠单抗平均=3.9±1.9)及注射费用(阿柏西普平均=$7468±$4211;雷珠单抗平均=$7816±$4834)均无显著差异(在以雷珠单抗为参照的多变量回归中:发病率比=0.97,95%置信区间[CI]0.91-1.03,P=0.277;费用比=0.96,95%CI0.89-1.04,P=0.338)。12个月分析中的差异也不显著。阿柏西普患者和雷珠单抗患者每次注射的总体平均间隔天数仅相差1.8(95%CI1.3-2.3)天(分别为42.4天和40.6天)。
在开始一线玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗的湿性AMD患者中,阿柏西普和雷珠单抗的使用频率相似,导致玻璃体内抗VEGF注射的医疗费用相似。