• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们如何识别持续质量改进?

How can we recognize continuous quality improvement?

机构信息

The RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA.;

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Feb;26(1):6-15. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt085. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzt085
PMID:24311732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3914565/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) methods are foundational approaches to improving healthcare delivery. Publications using the term CQI, however, are methodologically heterogeneous, and labels other than CQI are used to signify relevant approaches. Standards for identifying the use of CQI based on its key methodological features could enable more effective learning across quality improvement (QI) efforts. The objective was to identify essential methodological features for recognizing CQI.

DESIGN

Previous work with a 12-member international expert panel identified reliably abstracted CQI methodological features. We tested which features met rigorous a priori standards as essential features of CQI using a three-phase online modified-Delphi process.

SETTING

Primarily United States and Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

119 QI experts randomly assigned into four on-line panels.

INTERVENTION

Participants rated CQI features and discussed their answers using online, anonymous and asynchronous discussion boards. We analyzed ratings quantitatively and discussion threads qualitatively. Main outcome measure(s) Panel consensus on definitional CQI features.

RESULTS

/st> Seventy-nine (66%) panelists completed the process. Thirty-three completers self-identified as QI researchers, 18 as QI practitioners and 28 as both equally. The features 'systematic data guided activities,' 'designing with local conditions in mind' and 'iterative development and testing' met a priori standards as essential CQI features. Qualitative analyses showed cross-cutting themes focused on differences between QI and CQI.

CONCLUSIONS

We found consensus among a broad group of CQI researchers and practitioners on three features as essential for identifying QI work more specifically as 'CQI.' All three features are needed as a minimum standard for recognizing CQI methods.

摘要

目的

持续质量改进(CQI)方法是改善医疗服务提供的基础方法。然而,使用术语 CQI 的出版物在方法上存在异质性,并且使用其他标签来表示相关方法。基于其关键方法特征来识别 CQI 使用的标准可以使质量改进(QI)工作更有效地学习。目的是确定识别 CQI 的基本方法特征。

设计

以前与 12 名国际专家组成的小组进行的工作确定了可靠提取的 CQI 方法特征。我们使用三轮在线改良 Delphi 过程测试了哪些特征符合严格的先验标准,作为 CQI 的基本特征。

设置

主要在美国和加拿大。

参与者

119 名 QI 专家随机分配到四个在线小组。

干预措施

参与者对 CQI 特征进行评分,并使用在线、匿名和异步讨论板讨论他们的答案。我们对评分进行了定量分析,并对讨论线程进行了定性分析。

主要结果测量

小组对定义性 CQI 特征的共识。

结果

/st>79 名(66%)小组成员完成了该过程。33 名完成者自认为是 QI 研究人员,18 名是 QI 实践者,28 名是两者同等重要。特征“系统数据指导活动”、“设计时考虑当地条件”和“迭代开发和测试”符合先验标准,是 CQI 的基本特征。定性分析显示,交叉主题集中在 QI 和 CQI 之间的差异。

结论

我们在广泛的 CQI 研究人员和实践者中达成了共识,认为三个特征是将 QI 工作更具体地识别为“CQI”的基本特征。这三个特征是识别 CQI 方法的最低标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beee/3914565/a60dd9fe6417/mzt08501.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beee/3914565/a60dd9fe6417/mzt08501.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beee/3914565/a60dd9fe6417/mzt08501.jpg

相似文献

1
How can we recognize continuous quality improvement?我们如何识别持续质量改进?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Feb;26(1):6-15. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt085. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
2
Conducting online expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study.在线专家小组讨论:一项可行性和实验可重复性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 23;11:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-174.
3
Identifying continuous quality improvement publications: what makes an improvement intervention 'CQI'?识别持续质量改进出版物:是什么使改进干预措施成为“CQI”?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Dec;20(12):1011-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.050880. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
4
Identifying quality improvement intervention publications--a comparison of electronic search strategies.识别质量改进干预措施出版物——电子检索策略的比较。
Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 1;6:85. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-85.
5
Impact of externally facilitated continuous quality improvement cohorts on Advanced Access to support primary healthcare teams: protocol for a quasi-randomized cluster trial.外部推动的持续质量改进群组对支持初级保健团队的高级通道的影响:一项准随机对照群组试验方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Apr 11;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02048-y.
6
Impacts of continuous quality improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander primary health care in Australia.澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民初级卫生保健中持续质量改进的影响。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Jun 18;32(4):545-571. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0056. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
7
Quality improvement in primary care clinics.基层医疗诊所的质量改进
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Jul;24(7):361-70. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30387-x.
8
Teaching medical faculty how to apply continuous quality improvement to medical education.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Nov;24(11):640-52. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30412-6.
9
Employing continuous quality improvement in community-based substance abuse programs.在社区药物滥用项目中采用持续质量改进。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2012;25(7):604-17. doi: 10.1108/09526861211261208.
10
'At the grass roots level it's about sitting down and talking': exploring quality improvement through case studies with high-improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary healthcare services.“在基层,就是要坐下来交谈”:通过对改进效果显著的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民初级卫生保健服务的案例研究来探索质量改进。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e027568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027568.

引用本文的文献

1
Adapting the Grog survey app for alcohol screening and feedback in aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health services: a mixed methods study protocol.改编格罗格调查应用程序用于原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民健康服务中的酒精筛查与反馈:一项混合方法研究方案
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Sep 2;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00602-w.
2
Characteristics of Quality Improvement Projects in Health Services: A Systematic Scoping Review.卫生服务质量改进项目的特征:一项系统的范围综述
J Evid Based Med. 2025 Mar;18(1):e12670. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12670. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
Moving from to : A collaborative continuous quality improvement process for advancing Clinical and Translational Science.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality improvement tools for chronic disease care--more effective processes are less likely to be implemented in developing countries.用于慢性病护理的质量改进工具——在发展中国家,更有效的流程实施的可能性较小。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(1):14-9. doi: 10.1108/09526861311288604.
2
Measuring organizational and individual factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.测量被认为影响初级保健质量改进成功的组织和个体因素:工具的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2012 Dec 17;7(1):121. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-121.
3
Conducting online expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study.
从 迈向 :推进临床与转化科学的协作式持续质量改进过程。 (你提供的原文中两个冒号前内容缺失,我按照完整格式翻译了,你可根据实际内容修改完善)
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May 30;8(1):e103. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.555. eCollection 2024.
4
Decreasing Patient Visit Length at a Student-Run Free Clinic via a Continuous Quality Improvement Project.通过持续质量改进项目缩短学生运营的免费诊所的患者就诊时长
Cureus. 2024 Aug 9;16(8):e66511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66511. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Exploring the use of social network analysis methods in process improvement within healthcare organizations: a scoping review.探索社会网络分析方法在医疗保健组织内的流程改进中的应用:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):1030. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11475-1.
6
Using Dashboards to Support Continuous Quality Improvement in Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education.利用仪表板支持本科和研究生医学教育中的持续质量改进。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan;40(1):171-176. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09011-2. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
7
A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact.医疗保健系统持续质量改进的范围综述:概念化、模型和工具、障碍和促进因素以及影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10828-0.
8
Enhancing capability for continuous organisational improvement and learning in healthcare organisations: a systematic review of the literature 2013-2022.提升医疗组织持续组织改进和学习的能力:2013-2022 年文献系统综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 2;13(2):e002566. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002566.
9
Decision-maker roles in healthcare quality improvement projects: a scoping review.决策者在医疗质量改进项目中的角色:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 4;13(1):e002522. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002522.
10
Caring for high-need patients.照顾高需求患者。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):1289. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10236-w.
在线专家小组讨论:一项可行性和实验可重复性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 23;11:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-174.
4
Emerging perspectives on transforming the healthcare system: redesign strategies and a call for needed research.关于医疗体系改革的新视角:重新设计策略与所需研究的呼吁。
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S59-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821b57eb.
5
Identifying quality improvement intervention publications--a comparison of electronic search strategies.识别质量改进干预措施出版物——电子检索策略的比较。
Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 1;6:85. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-85.
6
Identifying continuous quality improvement publications: what makes an improvement intervention 'CQI'?识别持续质量改进出版物:是什么使改进干预措施成为“CQI”?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Dec;20(12):1011-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.050880. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
7
Identifying quality improvement intervention evaluations: is consensus achievable?识别质量改进干预评估:能否达成共识?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19(4):279-83. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036475. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
8
Organizational cost of quality improvement for depression care.抑郁症护理质量改进的组织成本。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):225-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00911.x.
9
Finding order in heterogeneity: types of quality-improvement intervention publications.在异质性中寻找秩序:质量改进干预措施出版物的类型
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):403-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.028423.
10
The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration.质量改进报告的SQUIRE(卓越质量改进报告标准)指南:解释与详述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Oct;17 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i13-32. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029058.