Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e80682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080682. eCollection 2013.
Participating in social network websites entails voluntarily sharing private information, and the explosive growth of social network websites over the last decade suggests shifting views on privacy. Concurrently, new anti-terrorism laws, such as the USA Patriot Act, ask citizens to surrender substantial claim to privacy in the name of greater security. I address two important questions regarding individuals' views on privacy raised by these trends. First, how does prompting individuals to consider security concerns affect their views on government actions that jeopardize privacy? Second, does the use of social network websites alter the effect of prompted security concerns? I posit that prompting individuals to consider security concerns does lead to an increased willingness to accept government actions that jeopardize privacy, but that frequent users of websites like Facebook are less likely to be swayed by prompted security concerns. An embedded survey experiment provides support for both parts of my claim.
参与社交网络网站需要自愿分享私人信息,而过去十年社交网络网站的爆炸式增长表明人们对隐私的看法正在发生变化。与此同时,新的反恐法律,如《美国爱国者法案》,要求公民以更大的安全为名义放弃对隐私的实质性主张。我提出了这两个趋势引发的关于个人隐私观点的两个重要问题。首先,促使个人考虑安全问题会如何影响他们对危及隐私的政府行为的看法?其次,使用社交网络网站是否会改变提示安全问题的效果?我假设,促使个人考虑安全问题确实会导致他们更愿意接受危及隐私的政府行为,但经常使用 Facebook 等网站的用户不太可能受到提示安全问题的影响。一项嵌入式调查实验支持了我的主张的两个部分。