• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你会接受政府的好友请求吗?社交网络和隐私问题。

Will you accept the government's friend request? Social networks and privacy concerns.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e80682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080682. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0080682
PMID:24312236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3842270/
Abstract

Participating in social network websites entails voluntarily sharing private information, and the explosive growth of social network websites over the last decade suggests shifting views on privacy. Concurrently, new anti-terrorism laws, such as the USA Patriot Act, ask citizens to surrender substantial claim to privacy in the name of greater security. I address two important questions regarding individuals' views on privacy raised by these trends. First, how does prompting individuals to consider security concerns affect their views on government actions that jeopardize privacy? Second, does the use of social network websites alter the effect of prompted security concerns? I posit that prompting individuals to consider security concerns does lead to an increased willingness to accept government actions that jeopardize privacy, but that frequent users of websites like Facebook are less likely to be swayed by prompted security concerns. An embedded survey experiment provides support for both parts of my claim.

摘要

参与社交网络网站需要自愿分享私人信息,而过去十年社交网络网站的爆炸式增长表明人们对隐私的看法正在发生变化。与此同时,新的反恐法律,如《美国爱国者法案》,要求公民以更大的安全为名义放弃对隐私的实质性主张。我提出了这两个趋势引发的关于个人隐私观点的两个重要问题。首先,促使个人考虑安全问题会如何影响他们对危及隐私的政府行为的看法?其次,使用社交网络网站是否会改变提示安全问题的效果?我假设,促使个人考虑安全问题确实会导致他们更愿意接受危及隐私的政府行为,但经常使用 Facebook 等网站的用户不太可能受到提示安全问题的影响。一项嵌入式调查实验支持了我的主张的两个部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6802/3842270/ffc047c57c5c/pone.0080682.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6802/3842270/7b94df00a8a7/pone.0080682.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6802/3842270/ffc047c57c5c/pone.0080682.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6802/3842270/7b94df00a8a7/pone.0080682.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6802/3842270/ffc047c57c5c/pone.0080682.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Will you accept the government's friend request? Social networks and privacy concerns.你会接受政府的好友请求吗?社交网络和隐私问题。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e80682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080682. eCollection 2013.
2
Privacy policies for health social networking sites.健康社交网站的隐私政策。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):704-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001500. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
3
Privacy Practices of Health Social Networking Sites: Implications for Privacy and Data Security in Online Cancer Communities.健康社交网站的隐私实践:对在线癌症社区隐私和数据安全的影响
Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Aug;34(8):355-9. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000249.
4
A Privacy Preservation Model for Health-Related Social Networking Sites.一种针对健康相关社交网站的隐私保护模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 8;17(7):e168. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3973.
5
Cybersecurity and privacy issues for socially integrated mobile healthcare applications operating in a multi-cloud environment.社交集成型移动医疗保健应用在多云环境中的网络安全和隐私问题。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Jun;25(2):315-329. doi: 10.1177/1460458217706184. Epub 2017 May 7.
6
Leaking privacy and shadow profiles in online social networks.在线社交网络中的隐私泄露和影子档案。
Sci Adv. 2017 Aug 4;3(8):e1701172. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701172. eCollection 2017 Aug.
7
Public assessment of new surveillance-oriented security technologies: Beyond the trade-off between privacy and security.公众对新型以监督为导向的安全技术的评估:超越隐私与安全之间的权衡。
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Jul;21(5):556-72. doi: 10.1177/0963662510376886. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
8
Distributed clinical data sharing via dynamic access-control policy transformation.通过动态访问控制策略转换实现分布式临床数据共享。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 May;89:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
9
Who commits virtual identity suicide? Differences in privacy concerns, Internet addiction, and personality between Facebook users and quitters.谁会进行虚拟身份自杀?Facebook 用户和退出者在隐私关注、网络成瘾和个性方面的差异。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Sep;16(9):629-34. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0323. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
10
Fictional privacy among Facebook users.脸书用户之间虚构的隐私。
Psychol Rep. 2012 Aug;111(1):289-92. doi: 10.2466/21.01.PR0.111.4.289-292.

引用本文的文献

1
The surprising power of a click requirement: How click requirements and warnings affect users' willingness to disclose personal information.点击需求的惊人力量:点击需求和警告如何影响用户披露个人信息的意愿。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 18;17(2):e0263097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263097. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987.1978 - 1987年美国的威胁与威权主义
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Oct;61(4):629-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.4.629.