• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线社交网络中的隐私泄露和影子档案。

Leaking privacy and shadow profiles in online social networks.

机构信息

Chair of Systems Design, ETH Zurich, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland. Email:

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2017 Aug 4;3(8):e1701172. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701172. eCollection 2017 Aug.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.1701172
PMID:28798961
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5544396/
Abstract

Social interaction and data integration in the digital society can affect the control that individuals have on their privacy. Social networking sites can access data from other services, including user contact lists where nonusers are listed too. Although most research on online privacy has focused on inference of personal information of users, this data integration poses the question of whether it is possible to predict personal information of nonusers. This article tests the shadow profile hypothesis, which postulates that the data given by the users of an online service predict personal information of nonusers. Using data from a disappeared social networking site, we perform a historical audit to evaluate whether personal data of nonusers could have been predicted with the personal data and contact lists shared by the users of the site. We analyze personal information of sexual orientation and relationship status, which follow regular mixing patterns in the social network. Going back in time over the growth of the network, we measure predictor performance as a function of network size and tendency of users to disclose their contact lists. This article presents robust evidence supporting the shadow profile hypothesis and reveals a multiplicative effect of network size and disclosure tendencies that accelerates the performance of predictors. These results call for new privacy paradigms that take into account the fact that individual privacy decisions do not happen in isolation and are mediated by the decisions of others.

摘要

在数字社会中,社交互动和数据集成可能会影响个人对隐私的控制。社交网站可以访问来自其他服务的数据,包括列出非用户的用户联系人列表。尽管大多数关于在线隐私的研究都集中在推断用户的个人信息上,但这种数据集成提出了一个问题,即是否可以预测非用户的个人信息。本文检验了影子档案假设,该假设认为,在线服务用户提供的数据可以预测非用户的个人信息。我们使用已消失的社交网站的数据进行历史审计,以评估是否可以使用该网站用户共享的个人数据和联系人列表来预测非用户的个人数据。我们分析了性取向和关系状态等个人信息,这些信息遵循社交网络中的常规混合模式。我们回溯网络的增长过程,根据网络规模和用户披露联系人列表的倾向,衡量预测器的性能。本文提供了有力的证据支持影子档案假设,并揭示了网络规模和披露倾向的相乘效应,这加速了预测器的性能。这些结果呼吁采用新的隐私范式,考虑到这样一个事实,即个人隐私决策不是孤立发生的,而是受到他人决策的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/7511ae90544b/1701172-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/9aac1b9f03d1/1701172-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/55b136d1b7af/1701172-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/c0f512f10f04/1701172-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/7511ae90544b/1701172-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/9aac1b9f03d1/1701172-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/55b136d1b7af/1701172-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/c0f512f10f04/1701172-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31cb/5544396/7511ae90544b/1701172-F4.jpg

相似文献

1
Leaking privacy and shadow profiles in online social networks.在线社交网络中的隐私泄露和影子档案。
Sci Adv. 2017 Aug 4;3(8):e1701172. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701172. eCollection 2017 Aug.
2
Privacy Practices of Health Social Networking Sites: Implications for Privacy and Data Security in Online Cancer Communities.健康社交网站的隐私实践:对在线癌症社区隐私和数据安全的影响
Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Aug;34(8):355-9. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000249.
3
A Privacy Preservation Model for Health-Related Social Networking Sites.一种针对健康相关社交网站的隐私保护模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 8;17(7):e168. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3973.
4
Anomaly detection over differential preserved privacy in online social networks.在线社交网络中差分隐私保护下的异常检测。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0215856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215856. eCollection 2019.
5
Research on Information Leakage Tracking Algorithms in Online Social Networks.在线社交网络中的信息泄露追踪算法研究。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Oct 4;2022:5634385. doi: 10.1155/2022/5634385. eCollection 2022.
6
CP-ABE Based Privacy-Preserving User Profile Matching in Mobile Social Networks.移动社交网络中基于CP-ABE的隐私保护用户简档匹配
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0157933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157933. eCollection 2016.
7
Privacy policies for health social networking sites.健康社交网站的隐私政策。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):704-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001500. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
8
Build your own social network laboratory with Social Lab: a tool for research in social media.使用 Social Lab 构建自己的社交网络实验室:一款用于社交媒体研究的工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Jun;46(2):430-8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0385-3.
9
What's on YOUR Facebook profile? Evaluation of an educational intervention to promote appropriate use of privacy settings by medical students on social networking sites.你的脸书个人资料上有什么?一项关于促进医学生在社交网站上合理使用隐私设置的教育干预措施的评估。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Jul 20;20:28708. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28708. eCollection 2015.
10
Data Mining and Privacy of Social Network Sites' Users: Implications of the Data Mining Problem.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):941-66. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9564-6. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Warning people that they are being microtargeted fails to eliminate persuasive advantage.警告人们他们正成为微观目标受众并不能消除说服力优势。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jan 29;3(1):15. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00188-8.
2
Blinding to Circumvent Human Biases: Deliberate Ignorance in Humans, Institutions, and Machines.为了规避人为偏见而进行蒙蔽:人类、机构和机器中的蓄意无知。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Sep;19(5):849-859. doi: 10.1177/17456916231188052. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
3
Technology and democracy: a paradox wrapped in a contradiction inside an irony.

本文引用的文献

1
ppcor: An R Package for a Fast Calculation to Semi-partial Correlation Coefficients.ppcor:一个用于快速计算半偏相关系数的R软件包。
Commun Stat Appl Methods. 2015 Nov;22(6):665-674. doi: 10.5351/CSAM.2015.22.6.665. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
2
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans.基于计算机的人格判断比人类做出的判断更准确。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 27;112(4):1036-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418680112. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
3
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior.
技术与民主:一个包裹在矛盾之中、深藏于讽刺之内的悖论。
Mem Mind Media. 2021 Dec 9;1. doi: 10.1017/mem.2021.7. eCollection 2022.
4
Contrasting social and non-social sources of predictability in human mobility.人类流动性中社会和非社会可预测性来源的对比。
Nat Commun. 2022 Apr 8;13(1):1922. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29592-y.
5
How to protect privacy in a datafied society? A presentation of multiple legal and conceptual approaches.如何在数据化社会中保护隐私?多种法律和概念方法介绍。
Philos Technol. 2022;35(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00497-4. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
6
Using game theory to thwart multistage privacy intrusions when sharing data.在数据共享时运用博弈论来挫败多阶段隐私入侵。
Sci Adv. 2021 Dec 10;7(50):eabe9986. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe9986.
7
Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools.公民与互联网:用认知工具应对数字挑战。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2020 Dec;21(3):103-156. doi: 10.1177/1529100620946707.
8
Complex Contagion Features without Social Reinforcement in a Model of Social Information Flow.社会信息流模型中无社会强化的复杂传染特征
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 26;22(3):265. doi: 10.3390/e22030265.
9
What demographic attributes do our digital footprints reveal? A systematic review.我们的数字足迹揭示了哪些人口统计属性?系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207112. eCollection 2018.
10
Findings from 2017 on Consumer Health Informatics and Education: Health Data Access and Sharing.2017年消费者健康信息学与教育研究结果:健康数据的获取与共享
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):163-169. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641218. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
个人特质和属性可从人类行为的数字记录中预测出来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5802-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218772110. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
4
Analysis of large-scale social and information networks.大规模社交和信息网络分析。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013 Feb 18;371(1987):20120378. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0378. Print 2013 Mar 28.
5
One plus one makes three (for social networks).一加一等于三(对于社交网络而言)。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034740. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
6
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.pROC:一个用于 R 和 S+的开源软件包,用于分析和比较 ROC 曲线。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77.
7
Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems.在线系统中社会影响的自发涌现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18375-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914572107. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
8
A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.一种比较源自相同病例的受试者工作特征曲线下面积的方法。
Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839-43. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708.