Suppr超能文献

叶南洋杉科的 DNA 条码鉴定——第二大的针叶树科。

DNA barcode identification of Podocarpaceae--the second largest conifer family.

机构信息

Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program for Molecular Systematics, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e81008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081008. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

We have generated matK, rbcL, and nrITS2 DNA barcodes for 320 specimens representing all 18 extant genera of the conifer family Podocarpaceae. The sample includes 145 of the 198 recognized species. Comparative analyses of sequence quality and species discrimination were conducted on the 159 individuals from which all three markers were recovered (representing 15 genera and 97 species). The vast majority of sequences were of high quality (B 30 = 0.596-0.989). Even the lowest quality sequences exceeded the minimum requirements of the BARCODE data standard. In the few instances that low quality sequences were generated, the responsible mechanism could not be discerned. There were no statistically significant differences in the discriminatory power of markers or marker combinations (p = 0.05). The discriminatory power of the barcode markers individually and in combination is low (56.7% of species at maximum). In some instances, species discrimination failed in spite of ostensibly useful variation being present (genotypes were shared among species), but in many cases there was simply an absence of sequence variation. Barcode gaps (maximum intraspecific p-distance > minimum interspecific p-distance) were observed in 50.5% of species when all three markers were considered simultaneously. The presence of a barcode gap was not predictive of discrimination success (p = 0.02) and there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of barcode gaps among markers (p = 0.05). In addition, there was no correlation between number of individuals sampled per species and the presence of a barcode gap (p = 0.27).

摘要

我们为 320 个标本生成了 matK、rbcL 和 nrITS2 DNA 条形码,这些标本代表了松柏科现存的 18 个属。样本包括 198 种已识别物种中的 145 种。我们对来自 159 个个体的序列质量和物种鉴别进行了比较分析,这些个体均回收了这三个标记(代表 15 个属和 97 个种)。绝大多数序列的质量很高(B 30 = 0.596-0.989)。即使质量最低的序列也超过了 BARCODE 数据标准的最低要求。在极少数产生低质量序列的情况下,无法辨别其原因。标记或标记组合的鉴别力没有统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.05)。条形码标记单独和组合的鉴别力较低(最大为 56.7%的物种)。在某些情况下,尽管存在明显有用的变异(种间共享基因型),但物种鉴别仍失败,但在许多情况下,根本没有序列变异。当同时考虑所有三个标记时,观察到 50.5%的物种存在条形码间隙(最大种内 p-距离>最小种间 p-距离)。条形码间隙的存在并不能预测鉴别成功(p = 0.02),而且标记之间条形码间隙的频率没有统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.05)。此外,每个物种采样的个体数量与条形码间隙的存在之间没有相关性(p = 0.27)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a5/3842326/dc5b0655e24e/pone.0081008.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验