Suppr超能文献

一项文拉法辛治疗抑郁可卡因依赖患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of venlafaxine for the treatment of depressed cocaine-dependent patients.

机构信息

Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Addict. 2014 Jan-Feb;23(1):68-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.12065.x. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study tested the hypothesis that the antidepressant venlafaxine would be an effective treatment for cocaine abusers with concurrent depressive disorders.

METHODS

This was a randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of outpatients (N = 130) meeting DSM-IIIR criteria for cocaine dependence and major depression or dysthymia (by SCID interview). Participants were treated with venlafaxine, up to 300 mg/day versus placebo. All patients received weekly individual manual-guided relapse prevention therapy. Weekly outcome measures included Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), self-reported cocaine use, urine toxicology and the Hamilton Depression Scale (Ham-D).

RESULTS

Mood response, defined as a 50% reduction in the Ham-D between randomization and end of study, was 41% (26/64) on venlafaxine, and 33% (22/66) on placebo (p = .39). Measures of depression (Ham-D and CGI) improved more rapidly on venlafaxine than placebo, but these differences disappeared by weeks 6-8. Cocaine outcomes did not differ between treatment groups, and the proportion of patients achieving three or more consecutive weeks of urine-confirmed abstinence was low (venlafaxine: 16%; placebo: 15%). Reduction in cocaine use was associated with mood response.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, venlafaxine was not superior to placebo on either mood or cocaine use outcomes. Mood improvement was associated with improvement in cocaine use. However, placebo mood response was only moderate, and the proportion of patients achieving sustained abstinence was low. This suggests that the subgroup of cocaine-dependent patients with depressive disorders is relatively treatment resistant, and that further research is needed to improve outcomes for these patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验抗抑郁药文拉法辛对并发抑郁障碍的可卡因滥用者有效的假说。

方法

这是一项为期 12 周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的门诊患者(N=130)试验,符合 DSM-III-R 可卡因依赖和重性抑郁或恶劣心境(SCID 访谈)标准。参与者接受文拉法辛治疗,剂量高达 300mg/天,或安慰剂治疗。所有患者均接受每周一次的个体手册指导的复发预防治疗。每周的结果测量包括临床总体印象量表(CGI)、自我报告的可卡因使用情况、尿液毒理学和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(Ham-D)。

结果

情绪反应定义为随机分组和研究结束时 Ham-D 减少 50%,文拉法辛组为 41%(26/64),安慰剂组为 33%(22/66)(p=0.39)。文拉法辛组的抑郁测量(Ham-D 和 CGI)比安慰剂组改善更快,但这些差异在第 6-8 周消失。治疗组之间的可卡因结果没有差异,且连续 3 周以上尿液确证的戒除率很低(文拉法辛:16%;安慰剂:15%)。可卡因使用量的减少与情绪反应相关。

结论

总体而言,文拉法辛在情绪或可卡因使用结果上均不比安慰剂优越。情绪改善与可卡因使用改善相关。然而,安慰剂的情绪反应仅为中度,且持续戒除的患者比例较低。这表明,有抑郁障碍的可卡因依赖患者亚组相对具有治疗抵抗性,需要进一步研究以改善这些患者的结局。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验