Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病药物治疗的潜在新靶点:二、 关于 secretase 抑制剂及相关方法的最新进展。

Potential novel targets for Alzheimer pharmacotherapy: II. Update on secretase inhibitors and related approaches.

机构信息

Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014 Feb;39(1):25-37. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12112. Epub 2013 Dec 8.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The prevailing theory regarding Alzheimer disease (AD) is that insoluble amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) plays a critical role in the cortical plaques characteristic of the disease. Because Aβ is formed from the sequential splicing of amyloid precursor protein (APP) catalysed by 'secretase' enzymes (α, β and γ), clinical trials of secretase inhibitors will either result in beneficial pharmacotherapy or, if negative, cast doubt on the role of Aβ in AD. With recent clinical trial failures, is the Aβ theory wrong?

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted on the topics of secretases and clinical trials, including PubMed searches, United States clinical trials directory, pharmaceutical company websites and news reports. The information was collected and evaluated for relevance and quality.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Several direct-acting (e.g. CTS-21166, LY2811376) and indirect-acting (e.g. ACI-91) β-secretase inhibitors and several γ-secretase inhibitors (e.g. avagacestat, JNJ-40418677 and semagacestat) have not fared well in early clinical trials due to the lack of efficacy or concerns over possible serious side effects.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The failures of secretase inhibitors in clinical trials appear to bring into question the long-hypothesized association between AD and Aβ production. However, the disease might have been too advanced in these patients to benefit from this type of therapy (mainly preventive). Secretase inhibitors are still being studied, along with new diagnostic tools, with the hope of testing patients earlier, that is, with less advanced disease. If these trials also fail, the prevailing view of the role of Aβ in AD will truly be in doubt.

摘要

已知和目的

阿尔茨海默病(AD)的主流理论认为,不溶性淀粉样β肽(Aβ)在疾病特征性皮质斑块中起关键作用。由于 Aβ是由淀粉样前体蛋白(APP)经“分泌酶”(α、β 和 γ)顺序剪接形成的,因此分泌酶抑制剂的临床试验要么会产生有益的药物治疗效果,要么如果结果为阴性,则会对 Aβ在 AD 中的作用产生怀疑。随着最近临床试验的失败,Aβ 理论是否错误?

方法

对分泌酶和临床试验的主题进行了文献检索,包括 PubMed 搜索、美国临床试验目录、制药公司网站和新闻报道。收集并评估了信息的相关性和质量。

结果和讨论

几种直接作用(例如 CTS-21166、LY2811376)和间接作用(例如 ACI-91)β-分泌酶抑制剂以及几种 γ-分泌酶抑制剂(例如 avagacestat、JNJ-40418677 和 semagacestat)在早期临床试验中效果不佳,原因是缺乏疗效或对可能出现的严重副作用的担忧。

新内容和结论

分泌酶抑制剂在临床试验中的失败似乎使人们对 AD 与 Aβ 产生之间的长期假设联系产生了质疑。然而,在这些患者中,疾病可能已经发展到晚期,无法从这种类型的治疗中受益(主要是预防性的)。目前仍在研究分泌酶抑制剂以及新的诊断工具,希望能够更早地对患者进行测试,也就是说,在疾病不太严重的时候进行测试。如果这些试验也失败了,那么 Aβ 在 AD 中的作用的主流观点将真正受到质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验