Netherlands Forensic Institute, Department of Medical Forensic Investigation, P.O. Box 24044, 2490 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10;233(1-3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.023. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
In cases of neonaticide with delayed finding of the body, interpretation of autopsy results can be difficult because of decomposition. Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) has become an increasingly popular tool in the (pediatric) forensic field. We performed a retrospective study to compare the outcome of PMCT with autopsy results in suspected neonaticide, in neonates found more than one week after their demise. We compared the performance of both methods on (1) determining gestational age, (2) differentiating between live birth and still birth and (3) determining cause of death.
We selected all consecutive neonaticide cases with an estimated postmortem interval longer than one week, who underwent a forensic autopsy including a total body PMCT in the Netherlands Forensic Institute in the period 2008-2012. Both a pathologist and radiologist scored gestational age, signs of live birth and cause of death for each case.
22 cases of neonaticide were identified in the study period, of which 15 cases were estimated to be found more than 1 week after death. In 12 of these a total body PMCT was performed. In all cases, late postmortem changes were present. Gestational age could be assessed with PMCT in 100% of the cases and with autopsy in 58% of the cases. In all cases neither PMCT nor autopsy was able to assess live birth and cause of death.
PMCT is a better tool for estimating gestational age in case of suspected neonaticide with late postmortem changes compared to autopsy and should therefore be a standard part of the work-up. Signs of live birth and cause of death could not be determined with neither of the methods, an adjusted post mortem examination including limited autopsy for these cases might be developed.
在延迟发现尸体的新生儿杀婴案件中,由于尸体已经分解,尸检结果的解读可能会比较困难。死后计算机断层扫描(PMCT)已成为(儿科)法医领域越来越受欢迎的工具。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了在死后一周以上发现的疑似新生儿杀婴案件中 PMCT 与尸检结果的结果。我们比较了这两种方法在(1)确定胎龄、(2)区分活产和死产,以及(3)确定死因方面的表现。
我们选择了在荷兰法医研究所进行法医尸检包括全身 PMCT 的所有连续新生儿杀婴案例,这些案例的死后估计时间超过一周。病理学家和放射科医生对每个案例的胎龄、活产迹象和死因进行评分。
在研究期间确定了 22 例新生儿杀婴案例,其中 15 例被估计在死后超过 1 周发现。在这些案例中,有 12 例进行了全身 PMCT。所有案例均存在晚期死后变化。PMCT 可在 100%的案例中评估胎龄,而尸检可在 58%的案例中评估胎龄。在所有案例中,PMCT 和尸检均无法评估活产和死因。
与尸检相比,PMCT 是一种更好的工具,可用于评估疑似新生儿杀婴伴有晚期死后变化的胎龄,因此应成为工作流程的标准部分。两种方法均无法确定活产和死因的迹象,可能需要为这些案例开发一种包括有限尸检的调整后的死后检查。