Postgraduate student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University; National Engineering Laboratory for Oral Regenerative Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University; State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Associate Professor, Department of Pedodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University; National Engineering Laboratory for Oral Regenerative Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University; State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Mar;111(3):203-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
A variety of zygomatic implantation techniques currently exist; however, a consensus regarding the most suitable method has not yet been reached.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare 3 zygomatic implantation techniques and to clarify the optimal number and position of zygomatic and dental implants for the reconstruction of the severely atrophied edentulous maxilla.
A 3-dimensional finite element analysis craniofacial model was constructed from the computed tomography data of a selected patient with a severely atrophic edentulous maxilla. Modeled zygomatic implants were inserted into the craniofacial model with 3 surgical techniques (classic Brånemark, exteriorized, and extramaxillary), and with 3 model variations that involved the number and position of zygomatic and dental implants. The zygomatic implants were loaded with a vertical force of 150 N and a lateral force of 50 N. The stresses on and deformations of the bones and implants were then observed and compared.
No obvious differences in the amount and distribution of stress on the external craniofacial bones were detected in the models. The lowest stresses on the zygomatic implants were observed in the exteriorized technique group. The lowest deformations of the bone that surrounds zygomatic implants and dental implants were observed in the exteriorized technique and classic Brånemark technique groups. For the exteriorized technique group, the model with 1 dental implant in the site of the maxillary lateral incisor exhibited the lowest stress on the zygomatic implants and the least deformation of the bone surrounding the zygomatic and dental implants.
All 3 zygomatic implant techniques resulted in more or less homogeneous transference of force and thus could reconstruct the edentulous maxilla; however, the exteriorized technique with 1 dental implant in the lateral incisor appeared to be the most appropriate reconstruction method for the severely atrophied edentulous maxilla.
目前存在多种颧骨植入技术;然而,对于最合适的方法尚未达成共识。
本研究旨在评估和比较 3 种颧骨植入技术,并阐明用于重建严重萎缩无牙上颌骨的最佳颧骨和牙种植体数量和位置。
从一名严重萎缩无牙上颌骨患者的计算机断层扫描数据中构建了一个三维有限元分析头面部模型。使用 3 种外科技术(经典 Brånemark、外置和外眶)和 3 种模型变化(涉及颧骨和牙种植体的数量和位置)将模拟的颧骨植入物插入到头面部模型中。将垂直力 150 N 和侧向力 50 N 施加于颧骨植入物。然后观察和比较骨骼和植入物上的应力和变形。
在模型中未发现外部头面部骨骼上的应力量和分布有明显差异。在外置技术组中观察到颧骨植入物上的应力最低。在外置技术和经典 Brånemark 技术组中观察到颧骨植入物和牙种植体周围骨骼的变形最小。对于外置技术组,在上颌侧切牙部位有 1 个牙种植体的模型显示颧骨植入物上的应力最低,颧骨和牙种植体周围骨骼的变形最小。
所有 3 种颧骨植入技术都导致或多或少的力均匀传递,从而能够重建无牙上颌骨;然而,在外置技术中在侧切牙部位有 1 个牙种植体似乎是严重萎缩无牙上颌骨最适合的重建方法。