The Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
The Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Feb;15(2):150.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
To analyze the contents and formats of general self-reported questionnaires on disability that are designed for and/or are widely applied in the elderly population to depict a complete picture of this field and help researchers to choose proper tools more efficiently.
A broad systematic literature search was performed in September 2013 and included the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PROQOLID. The publication language was limited to English and Chinese. Two review authors independently performed the study selection and data extraction. All of the included instruments were extracted and classified using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework.
Of 5569 articles retrieved from the searches and 156 articles retrieved from the pearling, 22 studies (including 24 questionnaires) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. From these, 42 different domains and 458 items were extracted. The most frequently used questionnaire was the Barthel Index followed by the Lawton and Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living, respectively. The contents and formats of the questionnaires varied considerably. Activities and participation were the most commonly assessed dimensions. In addition, the Activities of Daily Living, mobility and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale were the most common domains assessed among the included questionnaires.
Among the 24 included questionnaires, the most frequently used questionnaires were the Barthel Index, Lawton and Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, and Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living. The content and format of the questionnaires varied considerably, but none of the questionnaires covered all essential dimensions of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework.
分析专为老年人设计或广泛应用于老年人的一般自我报告残疾问卷的内容和格式，全面了解这一领域，帮助研究人员更有效地选择合适的工具。
2013 年 9 月进行了广泛的系统文献检索，包括以下数据库：MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 PROQOLID。出版语言限于英语和中文。两名综述作者独立进行了研究选择和数据提取。所有纳入的工具均采用国际功能、残疾和健康分类框架进行提取和分类。
从检索中检索到的 5569 篇文章和从珍珠搜索中检索到的 156 篇文章中，有 22 项研究（包括 24 份问卷）符合纳入标准。其中，提取了 42 个不同的领域和 458 个项目。使用最频繁的问卷是巴氏指数，其次是 Lawton 和 Brody 日常生活活动工具性活动量表和 Katz 日常生活活动指数。问卷的内容和格式差异很大。活动和参与是最常评估的维度。此外，日常生活活动、移动性和日常生活活动工具性活动量表是纳入问卷中最常见的评估领域。
在纳入的 24 份问卷中，使用最频繁的问卷是巴氏指数、Lawton 和 Brody 日常生活活动工具性活动量表以及 Katz 日常生活活动指数。问卷的内容和格式差异很大，但没有一份问卷涵盖了国际功能、残疾和健康分类框架的所有基本维度。
