Zeng Hongji, Zhao Weijia, Wang Rui, Wang Xin'ao, Luo Pengchao, Zhang Xuyang, Zeng Xi
School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Dysphagia Research Institution, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2478480. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2478480. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
Although the Geriatric Self-Care Scale (GSS) has been widely used in community investigations in China, its reliability and validity have yet to be analyzed.
This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the GSS in community-dwelling Chinese older adults.
This prospective observational study included 29428 older adults. Content validity was analyzed using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Reliability analysis included internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Differences in participants who could live independently versus those who could not were analyzed for discriminant validity. The Barthel Index was used as the gold standard. Spearman's correlation and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to assess convergent validity.
The CVI for the GSS was 0.920, with CVI values of 1.000, 0.900, 1.000, 0.800 and 0.900. The Cronbach's alpha for the GSS was 0.869 (for all participants) and 0.867 (for participants aged ≥ 65 years) and the item Cronbach's alpha coefficients were all >0.8. The Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients for both the scale and each item were greater than 0.8. There were significant differences ( < 0.05) between participants who could live independently and those who could not. There were significant correlations ( < 0.05) between the GSS and Barthel Index for each item and the total score. ROC analysis revealed that all areas under the curve were greater than 0.8, with a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 0.8.
The GSS showed good reliability and validity among community-dwelling older adults in China.
尽管老年自我护理量表(GSS)在中国社区调查中已被广泛使用,但其信效度尚未得到分析。
本研究旨在检验GSS在中国社区居住的老年人中的信效度。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了29428名老年人。使用内容效度指数(CVI)分析内容效度。信度分析包括内部一致性和重测信度。分析能够独立生活与不能独立生活的参与者之间的差异以检验区分效度。将巴氏指数用作金标准。使用Spearman相关性分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来评估聚合效度。
GSS的CVI为0.920,各维度的CVI值分别为1.000、0.900、1.000、0.800和0.900。GSS的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.869(所有参与者)和0.867(年龄≥65岁的参与者),各条目Cronbach's alpha系数均>0.8。量表及各条目的Pearson相关系数和组内相关系数均大于0.8。能够独立生活与不能独立生活的参与者之间存在显著差异(<0.05)。GSS与巴氏指数各条目及总分之间存在显著相关性(<0.05)。ROC分析显示,所有曲线下面积均大于0.8,敏感性和特异性均超过0.8。
GSS在中国社区居住的老年人中显示出良好的信效度。