Cury Ricardo C, Kitt Therese M, Feaheny Kathleen, Akin Jamie, George Richard T
Baptist Hospital of Miami and Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute, 8900 North Kendall Dr, Miami, FL 33176, USA.
Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Jan-Feb;8(1):2-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
Pharmacologic stress myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) has been reported to be a viable imaging modality for detection of myocardial ischemia compared with single-photon emission CT (SPECT) in several single-center studies. However, regadenoson-stress CTP has not previously been compared with SPECT in a multicenter, multivendor study. The rationale and design of a phase 2, randomized, cross-over study of regadenoson-stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CTP compared with SPECT are described herein. The study will be conducted at approximately 25 sites by using 6 different CT scanner models, including 64-, 128-, 256-, and 320-slice systems. Subjects with known/suspected coronary artery disease will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 imaging procedure sequences; rest and regadenoson-stress SPECT on day 1, then regadenoson-stress CTP and rest CTP/coronary CT angiography (same acquisition) on day 2; or regadenoson-stress CTP and rest CTP/CT angiography on day 1, then rest and regadenoson-stress SPECT on day 2. The prespecified primary analysis examines the agreement rate between CTP and SPECT for detecting or excluding ischemia (≥2 or 0-1 reversible defects, respectively), as assessed by 3 independent blinded readers for each modality. Non-inferiority will be indicated if the lower boundary of the 95% CI for the agreement rate is within 0.15 of 0.78 (the observed agreement rate in the regadenoson pivotal trials). The protocol described herein will support the first evaluation of regadenoson-stress CTP by using multiple scanner types compared with SPECT.
在一些单中心研究中,与单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)相比,药物负荷心肌CT灌注成像(CTP)已被报道是一种用于检测心肌缺血的可行成像方式。然而,既往尚未在多中心、多厂商研究中将雷加曲班负荷CTP与SPECT进行比较。本文描述了一项雷加曲班负荷心肌灌注成像CTP与SPECT对比的2期随机交叉研究的基本原理和设计。该研究将在约25个地点使用6种不同的CT扫描仪型号进行,包括64层、128层、256层和320层系统。患有已知/疑似冠状动脉疾病的受试者将被随机分配到2种成像程序序列中的一种;第1天进行静息和雷加曲班负荷SPECT,然后第2天进行雷加曲班负荷CTP和静息CTP/冠状动脉CT血管造影(相同采集);或第1天进行雷加曲班负荷CTP和静息CTP/CT血管造影,然后第2天进行静息和雷加曲班负荷SPECT。预先指定的主要分析检查CTP和SPECT在检测或排除缺血方面的符合率(分别为≥2个或0 - 1个可逆缺损),由每种成像方式的3名独立盲法阅片者进行评估。如果符合率的95%置信区间下限在0.78(雷加曲班关键试验中观察到的符合率)的0.15范围内,则表明非劣效性。本文所述方案将支持首次使用多种扫描仪类型将雷加曲班负荷CTP与SPECT进行比较的评估。