Suppr超能文献

经皮椎体成形术与保守治疗慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性脊柱骨折患者的比较。

Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with conservative treatment in patients with chronic painful osteoporotic spinal fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Shanghai 200233, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Shanghai 200233, China.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Mar;21(3):473-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

Abstract

The efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for patients with chronic painful osteoporotic compression fractures remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of PVP and conservative treatment (CT) for pain relief and functional outcome in patients with chronic compression fractures and persistent pain. Ninety-six patients with chronic compression fractures confirmed by MRI and persistent severe pain for 3 months or longer were prospectively randomly assigned to undergo PVP (n=46, Group A) or CT (n=50, Group B). The primary outcome was pain relief and functional outcome at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. A total of 89 patients (46 in Group A and 43 in Group B) completed the 1 year follow-up assessment. Pain relief and functional outcomes were significantly better in Group A than in Group B, as determined by visual analogue scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores, and Roland Morris Disability scores at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (all p<0.001). The final clinical follow-up assessment indicated complete pain relief in 39 Group A patients and 15 Group B patients (p<0.001). PVP for patients with chronic compression fractures and persistent severe pain was associated with better pain relief and improved functional outcomes at 1 year compared to CT.

摘要

经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性压缩性骨折的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较 PVP 和保守治疗(CT)对慢性压缩性骨折和持续性疼痛患者的疼痛缓解和功能结局的疗效。96 例 MRI 证实的慢性压缩性骨折且持续严重疼痛 3 个月或以上的患者前瞻性随机分为 PVP(n=46,A 组)或 CT(n=50,B 组)。主要结局是治疗后 1 周、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 1 年的疼痛缓解和功能结局。共有 89 例患者(A 组 46 例,B 组 43 例)完成了 1 年的随访评估。A 组的疼痛缓解和功能结局明显优于 B 组,通过视觉模拟评分、Oswestry 功能障碍指数评分和 Roland Morris 残疾评分在治疗后 1 周、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 1 年时进行评估(均 p<0.001)。最终临床随访评估表明,A 组 39 例患者和 B 组 15 例患者完全缓解疼痛(p<0.001)。与 CT 相比,对于慢性压缩性骨折和持续性严重疼痛的患者,PVP 治疗可获得更好的疼痛缓解和 1 年时的功能结局改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验