Suppr超能文献

草药性肝毒性:初次报告阳性再暴露检测病例分析。

Herbal hepatotoxicity: analysis of cases with initially reported positive re-exposure tests.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Hanau, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical Faculty of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Hanau, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical Faculty of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Mar;46(3):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Positive re-exposure tests are diagnostic hallmarks for hepatotoxicity.

OBJECTIVE

To test validity of positive re-exposures in herb induced liver injury.

METHODS

We searched Medline database for cases of herb induced liver injury with positive re-exposures and analysed 34 cases for positive re-exposure test criteria of baseline alanine aminotransferase< 5N before re-exposure, and re-exposure alanine aminotransferase ≥ 2× baseline alanine aminotransferase. Re-exposure test was negative, if baseline alanine aminotransferase< 5N combined with re-exposure alanine aminotransferase< 2× baseline alanine aminotransferase, or if baseline alanine aminotransferase≥ 5N regardless of the re-exposure alanine aminotransferase including no available re-exposure alanine aminotransferase result.

RESULTS

In 21/34 cases (61.8%), criteria for a positive re-exposure were fulfilled, with negative tests in 6/34 cases (17.6%) or uninterpretable ones in 7/34 cases (20.6%). Confirmed positive re-exposure tests established potential of herb induced liver injury for Aloe, Chaparral, Chinese herbal mixtures, Chinese Jin Bu Huan, Chinese Syo Saiko To, Germander, Greater Celandine, Green tea, Kava, Mistletoe, Polygonum multiflorum, and Senna, with up to 4 case reports per herb.

CONCLUSIONS

Among 34 cases of herb-induced liver injury with initially reported positive re-exposure tests, 61.8% of the cases actually fulfilled established test criteria and provided firm diagnoses of herb induced liver injury by various herbs.

摘要

背景

阳性再暴露试验是肝毒性的诊断标志。

目的

检验草药肝损伤阳性再暴露试验的有效性。

方法

我们检索了 Medline 数据库中具有阳性再暴露的草药肝损伤病例,并对 34 例病例进行了分析,以确定阳性再暴露试验的标准,即在再暴露前基线丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)<5N,再暴露时 ALT≥2×基线 ALT。如果基线 ALT<5N 且再暴露 ALT<2×基线 ALT,或基线 ALT≥5N 且无论再暴露 ALT 如何,包括无法获得再暴露 ALT 结果,则再暴露试验为阴性。

结果

在 34 例病例中,21 例(61.8%)符合阳性再暴露标准,6 例(17.6%)为阴性试验,7 例(20.6%)为无法解释的试验。确认的阳性再暴露试验确定了芦荟、金缕梅、中药混合物、金不换、四逆散、白毛夏枯草、绿茶、土大黄、卡瓦、槲寄生、何首乌和番泻叶等草药肝损伤的潜在可能性,每种草药的病例报告多达 4 例。

结论

在 34 例最初报告阳性再暴露试验的草药肝损伤病例中,61.8%的病例实际上符合既定的试验标准,并通过各种草药明确诊断为草药性肝损伤。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验