Suppr超能文献

压力袜与绷带治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的临床和成本效益比较(静脉性腿部溃疡研究 IV,VenUS IV):一项随机对照试验。

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of compression hosiery versus compression bandages in treatment of venous leg ulcers (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV, VenUS IV): a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):871-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62368-5. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drawbacks exist with the standard treatment (four-layer compression bandages) for venous leg ulcers. We have therefore compared the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two-layer compression hosiery with the four-layer bandage for the treatment of such ulcers.

METHODS

We undertook this pragmatic, open, randomised controlled trial with two parallel groups in 34 centres in England and Northern Ireland. The centres were community nurse teams or services, family doctor practices, leg ulcer clinics, tissue viability clinics or services, and wound clinics. Participants were aged 18 years or older with a venous leg ulcer and an ankle brachial pressure index of at least 0·8, and were tolerant of high compression. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) to receive two-layer compression hosiery or a four-layer bandage, using a remote randomisation service and prevalidated computer randomisation program. Participants were stratified by ulcer duration and ulcer area with permuted blocks (block sizes four and six). The primary endpoint was time to ulcer healing, with a maximum follow-up of 12 months. Although participants and health-care providers were not masked to treatment allocation, the primary endpoint was measured by masked assessment of photographs. Primary analysis was intention to treat with Cox regression, with adjustment for ulcer area, ulcer duration, physical mobility, and centre. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN register, number ISRCTN49373072.

FINDINGS

We randomly allocated 457 participants to the two treatment groups: 230 to two-layer hosiery and 227 to the four-layer bandage, of whom 453 (230 hosiery and 223 bandage) contributed data for analysis. Median time to ulcer healing was 99 days (95% CI 84-126) in the hosiery group and 98 days (85-112) in the bandage group, and the proportion of ulcers healing was much the same in the two groups (70·9% hosiery and 70·4% bandage). More hosiery participants changed their allocated treatment (38·3% hosiery vs 27·0% bandage; p=0·02). 300 participants had 895 adverse events, of which 85 (9·5%) were classed as serious but unrelated to trial treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Two-layer compression hosiery is a viable alternative to the four-layer bandage-it is equally as effective at healing venous leg ulcers. However, a higher rate of treatment changes in participants in the hosiery group than in the bandage group suggests that hosiery might not be suitable for all patients.

FUNDING

NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme (07/60/26).

摘要

背景

静脉性腿部溃疡的标准治疗(四层压缩绷带)存在一些弊端。因此,我们比较了双层压缩袜与四层绷带治疗此类溃疡的临床效果和成本效益。

方法

我们在英格兰和北爱尔兰的 34 个中心进行了这项实用、开放、随机对照试验,分为两组进行平行研究。这些中心包括社区护士团队或服务、家庭医生诊所、腿部溃疡诊所、组织活力诊所或服务以及伤口诊所。参与者年龄在 18 岁及以上,患有静脉性腿部溃疡,踝肱压指数至少为 0.8,并且能耐受高压。我们使用远程随机服务和经过验证的计算机随机化程序,按照 1:1 的比例将参与者随机分配到接受双层压缩袜或四层绷带治疗的两组中。根据溃疡持续时间和溃疡面积进行分层(区组大小为 4 和 6)。主要终点是溃疡愈合时间,最长随访时间为 12 个月。尽管参与者和医疗保健提供者未对治疗分配进行盲法,但主要终点是通过对照片进行盲法评估来测量。主要分析是意向治疗的 Cox 回归,调整了溃疡面积、溃疡持续时间、身体活动度和中心。这项试验在 ISRCTN 注册处注册,编号为 ISRCTN49373072。

结果

我们将 457 名参与者随机分配到两组治疗中:230 名接受双层压缩袜治疗,227 名接受四层绷带治疗,其中 453 名(230 名接受压缩袜治疗,223 名接受绷带治疗)提供了可供分析的数据。接受压缩袜治疗的患者中,溃疡愈合的中位数时间为 99 天(95%CI84-126),接受绷带治疗的患者中,溃疡愈合的中位数时间为 98 天(85-112),两组溃疡愈合的比例大致相同(压缩袜组 70.9%,绷带组 70.4%)。更多接受压缩袜治疗的患者改变了他们的分配治疗(压缩袜组 38.3%,绷带组 27.0%;p=0.02)。300 名参与者发生了 895 起不良事件,其中 85 起(9.5%)被归类为严重但与试验治疗无关。

解释

双层压缩袜是四层绷带的一种可行替代方案——它在治疗静脉性腿部溃疡方面同样有效。然而,接受压缩袜治疗的患者中治疗改变的比例高于接受绷带治疗的患者,这表明压缩袜可能不适合所有患者。

资金来源

英国国家健康与保健卓越研究所卫生技术评估计划(07/60/26)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验