University of Nantes, UMR CNRS 6144 GEPEA CBAC, Campus de la Courtaisière, IUT, 18 Bd G. Defferre, 85035 La Roche sur Yon, France.
LAAS-CNRS, 7, Avenue du Colonel Roche, BP 54200, 31031 Toulouse cedex 4, France; BIONEF, 73 rue de la Plaine, 75020 Paris, France.
Water Res. 2014 Feb 1;49:62-82. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.066. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
The Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) is one of the most widely used criteria for water quality assessment. It provides information about the ready biodegradable fraction of the organic load in water. However, this analytical method is time-consuming (generally 5 days, BOD5), and the results may vary according to the laboratory (20%), primarily due to fluctuations in the microbial diversity of the inoculum used. Work performed during the two last decades has resulted in several technologies that are less time-consuming and more reliable. This review is devoted to the analysis of the technical features of the principal methods described in the literature in order to compare their performances (measuring window, reliability, robustness) and to identify the pros and the cons of each method.
生化需氧量（BOD）是最广泛使用的水质评估标准之一。它提供了水中有机负荷可生物降解部分的信息。然而，这种分析方法耗时（通常为 5 天，BOD5），并且结果可能因实验室而异（20%），主要是由于接种物中微生物多样性的波动。过去二十年的工作已经产生了几种耗时更少且更可靠的技术。本综述旨在分析文献中描述的主要方法的技术特点，以比较它们的性能（测量窗口、可靠性、稳健性），并确定每种方法的优缺点。
