Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Curr Biol. 2013 Dec 16;23(24):2553-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.063. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
The brain directs its limited processing resources through various selection mechanisms, broadly referred to as attention. The present study investigated the temporal dynamics of two such selection mechanisms: space- and object-based selection. Previous evidence has demonstrated that preferential processing resulting from a spatial cue (i.e., space-based selection) spreads to uncued locations if those locations are part of the same object (i.e., resulting in object-based selection), but little is known about the relationship between these fundamental selection mechanisms. Here, we used human behavioral data to determine how space- and object-based selection simultaneously evolve under conditions that promote sustained attention at a cued location, varying the cue-to-target interval from 300 to 1100 ms. We tracked visual-target detection at a cued location (i.e., space-based selection), at an uncued location that was part of the same object (i.e., object-based selection), and at an uncued location that was part of a different object (i.e., in the absence of space- and object-based selection). The data demonstrate that even under static conditions, there is a moment-to-moment reweighting of attentional priorities based on object properties. This reweighting is revealed through rhythmic patterns of visual-target detection both within (at 8 Hz) and between (at 4 Hz) objects.
大脑通过各种选择机制(通常称为注意力)来引导其有限的处理资源。本研究调查了两种此类选择机制的时间动态:基于空间和基于对象的选择。先前的证据表明,如果位置是同一对象的一部分,则空间提示(即基于空间的选择)产生的优先处理会扩展到未提示的位置(即产生基于对象的选择),但对于这些基本选择机制之间的关系却知之甚少。在这里,我们使用人类行为数据来确定在促进提示位置持续注意力的条件下,基于空间和基于对象的选择如何同时演变,提示到目标的时间间隔从 300 毫秒变化到 1100 毫秒。我们在提示位置(即基于空间的选择)、同一对象的未提示位置(即基于对象的选择)和不同对象的未提示位置(即没有基于空间和基于对象的选择)处跟踪视觉目标检测。数据表明,即使在静态条件下,基于对象属性,注意力优先级也会不断重新加权。这种重新加权是通过对象内部(在 8Hz 时)和对象之间(在 4Hz 时)的视觉目标检测的节奏模式揭示的。