Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Vis. 2022 Jul 11;22(8):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.8.15.
Visual attention can be allocated to locations or objects, leading to enhanced processing of information at the specific location (space-based effects) or specific object (object-based effects). Previous studies have observed object-based effects to be smaller and less robust than space-based effects, with large individual differences in their temporal occurrence. Studies on space- and object-based effects are often based on a two-rectangle paradigm in which targets appear at cued locations more often than uncued locations. It is, however, unclear whether and how the target's spatial probability affects the temporal occurrence of these effects. In three experiments with different cue validities (80%, 50% and 33%), we systematically changed the interval between the cue and the target from 50 to 600 ms. On a group level and for individuals, we examined how cue validity affects the occurrence of object- and space-based effects. We observed that the magnitude and the prevalence of space-based effects heavily decreased with reduced cue validity. Object-based effects became even more sparse and turned increasingly negative with decreasing cue validity, representing a different-object rather than a same-object advantage. These findings indicate that changes in cue-validity affect both space- and object-based effects, but it does not account for the low prevalence and magnitude of object-based effects.
视觉注意力可以分配到位置或物体上,从而增强特定位置(基于空间的效应)或特定物体(基于物体的效应)的信息处理。先前的研究观察到,基于物体的效应比基于空间的效应更小且不那么稳健,其在时间发生上存在较大的个体差异。基于空间和基于物体的效应的研究通常基于两个矩形范式,其中目标出现在提示位置的频率高于未提示位置。然而,目前尚不清楚目标的空间概率是否以及如何影响这些效应的时间发生。在三个具有不同提示有效性(80%、50%和 33%)的实验中,我们系统地将提示和目标之间的间隔从 50 毫秒变为 600 毫秒。在群体水平和个体水平上,我们研究了提示有效性如何影响基于物体和基于空间的效应的发生。我们观察到,随着提示有效性的降低,基于空间的效应的幅度和普遍性大大降低。随着提示有效性的降低,基于物体的效应变得更加稀疏,并且变得越来越负,代表了不同物体而不是相同物体的优势。这些发现表明,提示有效性的变化会影响基于空间和基于物体的效应,但不能解释基于物体的效应的低普遍性和幅度。