Photosynthetic Bacteria Group, Biology Department, Indiana University, 47405, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Photosynth Res. 1993 Jan;35(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02185414.
Experiments of Hans Molisch in 1907 demonstrated that purple bacteria do not evolve molecular oxygen during photosynthetic metabolism, and can use organic compounds as sources of cell carbon for anaerobic 'photoheterotrophic' growth. Molisch's conclusion that he discovered a new photosynthetic growth mode was not accepted for some 30 years because of the prevailing definition of photosynthesis as light-dependent conversion of carbon dioxide and inorganic reductants to cell materials. Meanwhile, during the decade of the 1930s, Cornelis van Niel formulated the 'comparative biochemical watercleavage hypothesis' of photosynthesis, which enjoyed great popularity for about 20 years. According to this concept, photolysis of water yielded 'H' and 'OH', the former acting as the hydrogen donor for CO2 reduction in all modes of photosynthesis. Oxygenic organisms were presumed to contain a unique biochemical system capable of converting 'OH' to water and O2. To explain the absence of O2 formation by purple and green photosynthetic bacteria, it was supposed that such organisms lacked the oxygen-forming system and, instead, 'OH' was disposed of by reduction with an inorganic H(e) donor (other than water) according to the general equation:[Formula: see text] where H2A is H2 or an inorganic sulfur compound.Critical tests of van Niel's hypothesis could not be devised, and his proposal was abandoned soon after the discovery of in vitro photophosphorylation by green plant chloroplasts and membranes of purple bacteria in 1954. Photophosphorylation was then viewed as one key common denominator of oxygenic and anoxygenic photosyntheses. From later research it became clear that light-dependent phosphorylation of adenosine diphosphate was a consequence of photochemical charge separation and electron flow in reaction centers embedded in membranes of all photosynthetic organisms. The similarities, as well as the differences, in fine structure and function of reaction centers in anoxygenic and oxygenic organisms are now believed to reflect the course of evolution of oxygenic organisms from anoxygenic photosynthetic precursors. Thus, with the acquisition of new knowledge, concepts of the comparative biochemistry of photosynthetic processes have been radically altered during the past several decades. This paper describes highpoints of the history of these changes.
汉斯·莫尔施于 1907 年进行的实验表明,紫色细菌在光合作用代谢过程中不会产生分子氧,并且可以将有机化合物用作细胞碳源,进行无氧“异养光合作用”生长。由于当时光合作用的定义是依赖光将二氧化碳和无机还原剂转化为细胞物质,因此莫尔施关于他发现了一种新的光合作用生长模式的结论在大约 30 年内并未得到认可。与此同时,在 20 世纪 30 年代的十年间,科内利斯·范尼尔提出了光合作用的“比较生物化学水裂解假说”,该假说在大约 20 年内广受欢迎。根据这一概念,水的光解产生“H”和“OH”,前者在所有光合作用模式中充当 CO2 还原的氢供体。含氧生物被认为含有一种独特的生化系统,能够将“OH”转化为水和 O2。为了解释紫色和绿色光合细菌不形成 O2 的原因,人们认为这些生物缺乏形成 O2 的系统,而是根据一般方程式用无机 H(e)供体(除水之外的物质)还原“OH”:[公式:见正文],其中 H2A 是 H2 或无机硫化合物。范尼尔的假设无法进行关键性测试,并且在 1954 年发现绿色植物叶绿体和紫色细菌膜的体外光合磷酸化之后,他的提议很快就被放弃了。此后,光合磷酸化被视为含氧光合作用和厌氧光合作用的一个关键共同标准。从后来的研究中可以清楚地看出,依赖光的二磷酸腺苷磷酸化是反应中心在膜中的光化学电荷分离和电子流动的结果,而反应中心存在于所有光合生物的膜中。现在人们认为,在厌氧和含氧生物的反应中心的精细结构和功能方面的相似性和差异性反映了含氧生物从厌氧光合前体进化的过程。因此,随着新知识的获取,过去几十年中光合作用过程比较生物化学的概念发生了根本改变。本文描述了这些变化的历史要点。